Fighters who lose are just better.

Living next to a former pedophile is dumb. You can't cure someone's attraction.

 

You just took a huge dump on your own thread.

 

Me too. I wish Floyd was 48 and 0 the other way around. He would be the true TBE.

 

If you aren't trolling (I believe you are), this may quite possibly be the most foolish point of view I have read on here. This sounds like a multi-level marketing pep talk when the person keeps failing and the upline needs an excuse to keep the person motivated

 

a true warrior blood fighter will not be undefeated because as he challenges himself by fighting all legitimate opponents there will always be a kryptonite or an off night. in the next battle they just lick their wounds and fight again. the sport really requires it's die hard warriors to lose and experience the feel and taste of defeat as it is part of overcoming all obstacles. the undefeateds are just part of the few that focused more on the financial reward and the glory of winning that they lack the exprerience of defeat and rising again, they will always take the easier route but they will forever be incomplete. the greatest fighters all tasted defeat and will always be above the undefeateds. let the fans encourage more warriors who will show fighting spirit and love for the sport and not it's accolades alone.

 

lol I rather have a surgeon with a 100% success rate than one whose last patient died on the operating table but that's me. There is a saying that you learn more from a loss than you do from a win and I guess that is kind of where you are coming from.

 

Yes. If Muhammad Ali had lost to Forman and Frazier in the third fight, he would be viewed as much greater than he currently is. If Robinson had lost at least 4 of the 6 fights with Jake LaMotta, he also would be remembered more fondly. Everyone can agree that Jack Dempsey would be ranked higher had he stayed out of the ring against Luis Firpo.

 

No the thread title hurt my brain enough

 

Hook. Line. And. Sinker. :nod