When brook hold porter it's strategy ...

In that case I'd say we need a rule enforced against lunging at someone with your head down too then. Porter runs right into peoples chests constantly whilst throwing crude hooks that hit their backs.

The common denominator here is Porter. Brook is not known to excessively hold. Porter charges in head, elbows and all. There would be much less holding if he worked his way in.

 

Brook was smothering porter. Broner wasn't.
Watch it back bros.

 

Brook can't fight on the inside. He was holding all the time.

 

If Porter had been deducted a point for leading with his head perhaps he wouldn't have done that as much and Kell would not have needed to hold in order to counter that illegal move :think

 

Porter leading with his head shouldn't have amounted to that many clinches. Brook's clinching far outweighed Porter's dirty tactics.

 

Exactly!!!

 

no brit****, porter didnt lead with his head close to as many times that brook clinched, so no not exactly.

 

Porter initiated plenty of clinches on his own :nod

 

nono Brook initiated farrrrr more.

 

And led with his head far less :nod

 

:yep

 

yes, but if you add porter leading with his head, and intiating clinches, it's stil faaaaar less than Brook initiating clinches which was some Abril like tactics against Rios.

 

I couldn't disagree more. :conf

 

you're in the minority :nod

 

You are objective on the matter :nod