Who ranks higher All time? Hopkins or Calzaghe?

BHOP was robbed and you are the biggest fanboy on this site.

 

Since almost no one in the world has ever heard of Calzagga or Calzaahhagefeather or whatever it is, I say Berhard Hopkins ranks way higher.

 

What post?

 

there is no post. there is only you.

 

I don't think the weight was an issue at all... Do I think Eubank was peak? No, but it gets forgotten too that Calzaghe was very green, and not properly hydrated.

 

that's only because they've had you on ignore for several years.

 

a name is a word, dictionary def that I posted for you...so now you think the dictionary is dumb. ok, you can think that.

says the guy constantly replying to posts calling him failey. not your name?


boy u sure know how to fail hard.

 

Care to post your scorecard? This should be good.

 

Robbed atsch

 

Didn't you know that Hopkins only lost because of the white boy comment?

 

The fact that Joe Calzaghes win over a 44 year old Bernard Hopkins is one of the three best of his whole career, tells us just how great Hopkins actually are. If you're an HOF's/ATG's (Calzaghe is borderline IMO) best win at 44, you're a bloody legend.

That's why Hopkins > Calzaghe.

 

The poll has spoken and its not even close.

 

Very true. Only the Calzaghe fanboys will say otherwise. They are a small and I mean SMALL minority in the boxing world.

 

if they fought during their prime and calzhage beat him then he may have a case but it happened too late just like floyd-pac. one past fight does not change much their career accomplishments. trilogies best compare head to head match ups especially on or near their primes.