Should Floyd Patterson be criticized for for defending his title against

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jun 19, 2015.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
  2. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    Why do you keep harping on about Ring magazine ratings. They mean nothing. NOTHING. Title fights arent dictated by the Ring anymore than they were dictated by Boxing Illustrated, Boxing Monthly, or Sports Illustrated. You can quote Ring magazine ratings until your face turns purple with pink polka dots but it still doesnt mean jack ****.
     
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Maghoo, Mongoose, Klompton, Edward

    Read this

    https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AIBAJ&sjid=uvwFAAAAIBAJ&pg=6130,3858396&hl=en


    Some quotes from this article titled "Its high time patterson was exposed to physical hazzard" Dec 8 1961 by The Telegraph

    "Cus D'Amato, was making noises indicating patterson was preparing to run back to his hole again and continue to hide from Liston and other worth while challengers."

    "Damato indicated that he preferred Henry Cooper, another soft touch, as his next opponent"

    "This now raises the big question, how much longer are the Dizzards who run the beak busing business, or are supposed to conduct it, going to tolerate the gall of the young man who clutches the heavyweight championship and his presumptious manager? This cautious yet bold, alliance has defied authority, broken all the ordinary rules of fair play and outraged the comparatively few fight fans remaining, with their evasion of opponents who might do harm to the doughty title holder."

    "If D'Amato objects to Liston as a foe for the pure Patterson because of Sonny's alleged underworld connections, there are three other good fighters around despite what the champion and Cus the Mus have done. It's time to stop this nonsense-Patterson boxing nobodies."

    "Eddie Machen, has been knocking for several years at the door behind which Patterson has been lurking. Harold Johnson is highly regarded. Doug Jones is a solid puncher, which probably barns him automatically from a shot at the heavyweight crown."

    "Asked of whom patterson would fight if not Liston, little napolean DAmato, still full of cloak and dagger said 'if i told you, you'd know, and I might not get to him.' It is logic like that which brought patterson and Damato to the top and has enabled them to keep the title-against blokes like hurricane jackson, pete radamacher, roy harris, brian london, mcneeley. Gun Shy Cus will go down as the greatest of managers."


    "Cus Damato parlayed Floyd Patterson into millions of dollars without once knowingly exposing him to physical jeopardy."
     
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    So the only one saying Machen turned down a Patterson fight is Cus himself right? So we must take Cus's word without any other evidence?

    There is plenty of evidence Machen wanted Floyd

    https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AIBAJ&sjid=4UkDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5756,2177449&hl=en

    Machen challenging Floyd here in 1956



    If we took all other managers words for Gospel, Then Bobby Gleason(valdes manager) said "Nino can punch and Cus doesn't like to fight punchers"

    https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AIBAJ&sjid=3IkFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3268,3137950&hl=en
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    Ok


    National Boxing Association June 1958

    Champion: Floyd Patterson

    Co Number 1's: Eddie Machen and Zora Folley

    https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AAIBAJ&sjid=jPcDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6070,494524&hl=en
     
  6. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
  7. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009

    So the #1 agreed to fight Rademacher in his next fight.

    The #2 was injured.

    Already KOed #4.

    The #3 lost to #5, who was noted to lose his rating only over service.
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    stop making excuses, floyd had plenty of time to negotiate a fight with his number 1 or number 2

    https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AAIBAJ&sjid=gPcDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3446,327973&hl=en


    https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AIBAJ&sjid=M80EAAAAIBAJ&pg=4221,4190345&hl=en

    "A lot of fighters ducked me and it wasn't only Floyd Patterson when he was champ"- Zora Folley

    "We put up gaurantees but patterson would always back out" - Bill Swift, Folleys Manager



    https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AAIBAJ&sjid=sPwFAAAAIBAJ&pg=7195,937495&hl=en

    https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AIBAJ&sjid=8VYDAAAAIBAJ&pg=7173,1286870&hl=en

    "I can't believe after all these years, Floyd is finally going to get in the ring with me"- EDDIE MACHEN 1964


    https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AIBAJ&sjid=vIoDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3364,3161872&hl=en
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Mongoose,

    Check back on Page 4

    Here is what you said


    "The Holman win did more for Pastrano, than the Valdes win did for Machen. "
     
  10. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    And what is your point? Nobody is disputing that. What is in dispute is your goofy ass timeline that takes one factoid: 1. Machen 2. Folley and completely ignores everything else sorrounding that time and those events. You want to ignore how boring those two were and how colorless. You want to ignore that Machen turned down at least one fight with Cus. You want to ignore that both guys were tied to the IBC and in fact it was the IBC that put together their elimination and the IBC that admitted their gamble failed by stating "where does this leave us now???" You want to forget that Roy Harris was popular and had been rated #2 only to be dropped due to his stint in the service. You want to forget that Rademacher was so popular that during the painfully dull Folley-Machen fight the audience booed both fighters and called for Rademacher. You want to forget that most observers admitted that after the fight Folley and Machen were not ready for a shot at the title. Most importantly you cant admit that the division at this point was largely colorless and devoid of anyone who was real threat to Patterson until Ingo and Liston emerged. Exactly why colorful guys like Rademacher and Harris got title shots. Nevermind that Patterson's reign was typified by him fighting either #1 contenders or highly ranked fighters. Those are all inconventient truths for you because you NEED to believe this stupid narrative that someone got ducked.

    You post a bunch of quotes from Folley and his manager and those are supposed to mean what exactly? Are fighters ever the best or most truthful judges of their career? Hardly.

    Machen: "I cant believe hes getting into the ring with me after all of these years..." And then Patterson dominated him without even trying, closing his eye and bloodying him. And guess who Patterson called out after the fight? Not Ali, the champion (who he had just earned a fight with, but Sonny Liston, who was no longer champion and who Patterson didnt need to fight. So goes the idea that Patterson never chased a third fight with Liston or that Patterson ducked punchers.

    Instead of picking and choosing these little tidbit quotes to support your argument why dont you do what actual historians do and give us a real, unvarnished, documented timeline of events. You couldnt do that because your fantasy would immediately fall apart.
     
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    1. Machen and Folley- Boring and Colorless. Yet still earned the respect as the number 1 and number 2 guys. Machen called Floyd out as early as 56.

    Where is your evidence Machen turned down a fight with patterson other than from D'amatos word of mouth?

    Harris was popular, why because he was white cowboy who could fight? Wheres your proof he was more popular than Machen or Folley?

    Where is your evidence Harris was rated 2 leading up to fighting patterson?

    I have my own two eyes. I think Floyd and Machen presented far stiffer challenges for Floyd stylistically than Harris, Radamacher, Mcneeley, and London did. I think they are tough fights for Floyd.

    I also think Johansson-Machen rematch would have gone a lot differently. Johansson caught Machen cold like he did Patterson. In the rematches, Patterson sparked him out. I don't know if Machen would do that, but I think had a rematch gone off, it would have been very close. Machen actually sued johansson for breaking the clause of a guaranteed rematch.

    I think Folley and Machen proved throughout their long careers both were very good classical boxers who deserved a title shot in their primes vs Floyd Patterson anywhere from 1957-1961.

    Except both Machen and Folley reached number 1 status during Floyd's reign and he did not fight either man, instead fighting 4 men who were rated lower.
     
  12. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    We both know Eddie Machen was not physically or mentally stable by 1964. He shouldn't have even been allowed to fight. He was sent to the Nut House in 1963 and never recovered.

    Furthermore which is a different debate,

    I have a lot of evidence that suggests Patterson ducked a WBA elimination match with Cleveland Williams in 1964 order to fight Machen. Plenty of evidence. Different debate.

    Again we are talking about Patterson Title Reign. Not after Patterson title reign.

    Patterson should have fought 2 of his 7 title defenses against Machen and Folley. True or False?

    My opinion is Cus D Amato did duck punchers during Floyd reign, and when Floyd convinced Cus to let him fight a puncher, he usually got knocked out early. I think floyd was vulnerable against big punchers.
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Nothing is fantasy. Eddie Machen and zora Folley are better than Roy Harris. Both deserved title shots over Roy Harris. That is reality not fantasy

    As for a documented timeline of events, that's s lot of work. I'm just s boxing fan, not a self proclaimed historian like you. I have a full time job and family to support, if you do boxing full time then please by all means give me a timeline telling me how Roy Harris deserved a title shot over those two and why he was just as good as those two.
     
  14. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    The bottom line is Zora Folley and Eddie Machen were good enough to challenge for the title but circumstances (them losing fights, not maintaining enough public appeal, infrequent title defences) prevented the two of them meeting Patterson.

    I have every faith that had circumstances allowed Patterson defend three times per year rather than one or two times he would have fought both of them.
     
  15. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    at the time it was considered negligible, especially in the case of Folley. many thought they were all equal. Pastrano,Harris, Folley. Throw in Cooper and London. Ingo was the only one that stood out in 1958.