Who ranks higher All time? Hopkins or Calzaghe?

Its been a weird 4 weeks to say the least.

 

Show me where failey is in the dictionary
show me where failey is listed as a name
Me replying to a post with failey in it, doesnt make it a name.
Herol selfpwned again . You are an irrelevant poster, but you do get recognised as the most pwned poster :yep

 

Yeah I would like to see that scorecard as well

 

Zaggers :happy

 

Chris Eubank was preparing to fight Mark Prince at LHW and with 2 weeks notice went down in weight to fight Joe Calzaghe.

The effect of the change in weight may not be as dangerous as the change of opponent. Maybe you would require more than 2 weeks preparation to get ready for a slick high volume undefeated southpaw with slap technique like Calzaghe and that for a world title.

Still semi retired, weight drained, 2 week prepared battle torn, lisp talking, exhibition bouts in Dubai fighting, lost his killer instinct after Watson II battling, boxing at Cruiserweight before and after Calzaghe fighting, old legendary veteran underdog Chris Eubank... still managed to take young hungry Calzaghe into the trenches and finished strong.

 

Hopkins, and its not close.

 

Yeah I think everyone pretty much accepts that here no one is even really questioning who ranks higher or Hopkins status, people just questioning Calzaghe's resume as it lacks the quality to match up against BHops.

 

not to forget also fighting in calzaghe backyard with joes ref, eubank had no chance of winning.

 

why would failey be in the dictionary? u are going mad, dude, you really are going fruitloop.

 

Joe beat Chris wide, fair and square. Please give me specific examples of how the referee or location had any impact on the outcome.

 

Fixed :nod

 

Zaggers :happy

 

so, zaggers is of the opinion that bhop beat him, and fixed the poll.