Sam Langford vs Mike Tyson

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jul 1, 2015.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,740
    Sep 14, 2005
    Prime for Prime
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,822
    29,267
    Jun 2, 2006
    Tyson 40lbs of muscle advantage and too much speed. I give Langford a shot against the smaller, slower Marciano though.
     
  3. Phil_Ivey_76

    Phil_Ivey_76 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,823
    176
    Aug 26, 2013
  4. Phil_Ivey_76

    Phil_Ivey_76 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,823
    176
    Aug 26, 2013
    I remember a post on here where people was reckoning Langford would of beat Wlad.
     
  5. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,620
    9,655
    Jul 15, 2008
    Langford had limitations at heavyweight .. he could be outboxed by large men with strong jabs .. I just don't see him big enough to outslug a prime Tyson ..
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,664
    27,379
    Feb 15, 2006
    Prime for prime Tyson.

    Post prison, Langford takes it.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,822
    29,267
    Jun 2, 2006
    The problem for Sam is his best weight was around 175/180lbs, above that, [which he often was,] he was carrying unnecessary suet.
     
  8. Entaowed

    Entaowed Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,837
    4,175
    Dec 16, 2012
    It would be very hard for a man who was essentially a quite short LHW to beat any Tyson that was not totally shot.

    It is not really at all a fair ask.
     
  9. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    The version that lost to Lewis still knocks Langford spark out.

    You simply aren't surviving Tyson without any sort of physical advantages.
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,582
    Nov 24, 2005
    Tyson would not get inside Langford's long reach.
    Langford too skilful.
    Langford the greatest fighter ever, so obviously the best guess is he wins.
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,582
    Nov 24, 2005
    There's always a chance Tyson would eat his a$shole alive though.
    It's gay, but if the referee lets you get away with it ...
     
  12. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Could Langford outbox Tyson like Spinks did?
     
  13. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,582
    Nov 24, 2005
    He'd do better than Spinks, (who took an obvious dive or was just sh!t).
    He'd do a Buster Douglas.

    Langford had a huge reach, maybe 84 inches, (my estimation based on the available footage, 75 inch is BS !) and a ramrod jab.
    Langford was the greatest fighter ever, that's what I've heard.
    Think about it. GOAT with huge gorilla arms, against Tyson who had quite short reach. No contest.

    Tyson was good for a while, but can't compare with GOAT.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,664
    27,379
    Feb 15, 2006
    Generally I would agree, but there is another way to fight Tyson.

    Simply press him on the inside.

    Holyfield did this successfully, but it would be interesting to see how he would cope with a shorter fighter doing it.
     
  15. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,582
    Nov 24, 2005
    Langford has most of the physical advantages.
    He was built like a tank, and had huge reach.
    He's only an inch or two shorter, and weighed 200 pounds or more in some of his best heavyweight fights.
    He had short torso and long legs. He was mobile.
    Fast, powerful.
    Oh, and have I mentioned he was the greatest fighter of all-time ?