Rewriting a Wrong. Should the vacant 1966 FOTY award go to Ali.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by hussleman, Jul 14, 2015.


  1. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Well if one knows boxing history. They know that because of racist politics that the 1966 fighter of the year award that should have went to Ali became vacant. His stance on the Vietnam war was the major reason . When he successfully defeated his title 5 times. Should Ring magazine due the noble thing and award him the award that was justifiable his. It would be the ring thing to do.
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    [url]The Ring[/url] was founded in 1922 and has presented the Fighter of the Year award since 1928. [url]Nat Fleischer[/url], the magazine's founder, said the award would go to the boxer who had earned the esteem of the sports public by his conduct and fighting qualities. Originally, the four points which a boxer had to meet to receive the award were:
    1. He must be foremost in his contribution to the skill and the science of boxing and he need not be a champion.
    2. The recipient must combine with his high place in the ranking of fighters a similar position as a sportsman.
    3. He must associate with the abilities as a fighter good public relations and a reputation for clean and moral living.
    4. The boxer receiving the award must be recognized as an example to the growing American youth.
    The Ring has twice chosen not to present the award because of their choice's out-of-the-ring activities. The publication said [url]Primo Carnera[/url] should have received the award for 1933, but they chose not to give it to him because of his ties to organized crime. In 1966, the magazine said [url]Muhammad Ali[/url] should have been the recipient, but he didn't get it because of his membership in the Nation of Islam and his objection to the U.S. military draft.
    The recipient of the award use to receive a gold and silver medal. Later awards included a [url]belt[/url] and a [url]plaque[/url].


    [url]http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Ring_Magazine_Fighter_of_the_Year[/url]
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    It seems the "Fighter of the Year" Award wasn't just about performance in the boxing ring.

    It was about conduct outside the ring too.
     
  4. Rope-a-Dope

    Rope-a-Dope Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,138
    7,974
    Jan 20, 2015
    If conduct outside the ring counted, then Monzon and Tyson should never have gotten their FOTY awards.
     
  5. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Different eras.

    The old editor Nat Flesicher died in 1972.
    Also, I'm not sure Carlos Monzon's 'bad conduct' was well known in the US at that time.
     
  6. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
  7. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,640
    18,437
    Jun 25, 2014
    No. Of course not.

    They felt they were being "noble" and taking a "moral" stand when they didn't give it to him.

    At that time, the U.S. required citizens to register for the selective service and take part in the draft, and Ali's birth date got called. He broke the law when he refused induction.

    There are a lot of countries today that still insist on mandatory military service.

    If the U.S. decides to reinstate the draft, it'll be the law again.

    You can't keep going back and retroactively handing out awards based on which laws change in your country.

    What happened happened. It was part of history. Leave it be.
     
  8. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,587
    2,493
    Nov 6, 2011
    Hilarious that Mayweather only won the award back in 07.