How does Deontay Wilder stack up to Evander Holyfield?

Wilder has both of his ears still intact; so that's Wilder 1 Holyfield 0...!!!

 

We'd have to see Deontay fight better opposition to determine that. Is his resume far better than Fury's? yes, but it's still very lacking.

 

it would be common sense so assume that Holyfield wrecks Wilder. Holyfield had good head movement, could take a punch (lewis didnt think he was able to knock out Holyfield he was quoted as that) actually i think the actual quote was Question: "So Lewis are you predicting a knockout", Lewis: "are you kidding!!, ....have you seen the size of this guys neck!"

Holyfield had decent head movement and could fight on the inside, tools that take away a lot of the things Wilder has going for him. Id think that Holyfield hurts him on the inside then catches him to spark him out.

 

Not well

 

Holyfield (probably even without the roids) >>> Wilder.

 

Why you trying to stack boxers man? They are human beings, not Lego's.

I will say that Wilder is taller and narrower, with more tats but is less more balder.

So overall maybe a B-? :think

 

Blasphemy.

 

Holyfield's 52 years old. Wilder probably beats him.

 

Poorly

 

MVC what is the point of this thread? One guy has fought more or less C/D level opposition at this point, there's absolutely nothing to compare, in three or four years it'd make more sense.

 

MVC you overrate the **** out of Wilder. Chill.

 

Wilder is a fraud with a record padded with stiffs. Holyfield is an all-time great who fought the best HWs in multiple eras. This isn't an difficult call to make.

 

Wilder isn't fit to lace Holyfields boots.... I'd pick mid 40s Evander to destroy this fraud. Different level of fighter, insulting to compare Holyfield with this fraud.