Crolla not getting the belt is Hearns karma for Burns-Beltran

Name one Muslim I have ever said that has been robbed?

 

Does Khan deserve the Mayweather shot you've been banging on about relentlessly? **** off your turban wearing racist.

 

Bin Laden when the yanks invaded his compound

 

But Crolla had nothing to do with Beltran in any shape or form ?? that is not karma mate ... you dont know what it means if u think it is !!

The very fact that he won (fuk the judges)shows he deserved the fight. The very same reason that if Floyd steps up to MW he deserves a title shot cos he good enough even tho he hasnt fought anyone at that weight since moving up same with Ward and Kovalev, GGG and Ward/froch etc.... you cant say any of them dnt deserve the fight despite not being proven at that weight ?

 

you may not have and i aint goin thro your post history to find out so i will just apologise if that is the case. You do back every Msulim boxer coming thro' however regardless how little talent they have and mark them as "the next big thing" many many many times iv seen this but never seen a post doing the same with a caucasian. First of all there is nothing wrong with that in the slightest but that is where the presumptions come from

 

Its Karma for Eddie Hearn and Matchroom, I didnt see scores of UK fighters swearing on IFL TV interviews after Beltran got ****ed over here, in a performance that was much more conclusive and included a knockdown.

 

minus the end part you will do very well to argue your way outta that one !

 

Collazo, Alexander, Algeri and Diaz are much higher ranked then Rees and Murray FACT

 

Crolla's resume has no comparison to Khans silly silly comparison

 

No its not Eddie got paid on both occasions Crolla will get another title shot and he will make more money again .. of course you didnt hear guys goin off their nut at Beltran he didnt have any fans here !!

and as has been said two wrongs dont make a right and Heanr was not the one who was screwed here it was Crolla .... Hearn made the same money regardless ! infact it prob increases the rematch stake and he makes more money again so could even benefit him.... Crolla was the one that lost out here and there is no Karma involved there.

 

its is also no comparison to Floyds but doesnt stop hm putting himself on the same level (Khan actually thinks eh is better). Do you think Amirs record at current weight is good enough to secure a fight against n1 p4p in the world?

ps i do think Khan deserves the shot btw... but thro different logic

 

Yeah well it was still funny to watch Hearns dissapointed little face after

 

No but Khan held versions of the world title at a lower weight and has beaten top ten contenders.

Crolla beating Murray and Rees, does not compare with Khan bashing up Collazo and Alexander FACT

 

were not comparing Khan and Crolla we are comapring Khans record with the champ you think he deserves he should be in with ... ie the same logic used for Crolla gettin a shot at the title...ps i dont rank any of they fighters at world level at WW , possibly at the weight below (still not guaranteed) but not WW.

U cant use the reason for saying Crolla doesnt deserve a shot (fighter before the fight were not of high enough level) but also ignore that logic for one of your favoured fighters.

As i said also i think Khan is within the top 3 WW without a title and therefore deserves a shot and is my logic its not based on him not fighting anyone in top 10 of his weightclass

 

Is that a run of opponents deserving of a shot vs the P4P number 1?