What Dempsey did well was destroy big fighters, and what Carnera did not do so well, was survive finishers. I think we can go with Dempsey on this one.
Jack Dempsey did Throw a punch in anger at Carnera once. He was officiating a fight, and he swung for Primo, after he ignored his instructions.
It would have been a spectacular film, but honestly I'm glad Carnera vs prime Dempsey never happened. The big guy took enough beatdowns.
In general terms yes. Dempsey methodically stops him early, while Marciano plays the attrition game, against a much bigger man. You don't have to think that Dempsey is better, to think that he does better here.
Marciano has true one punch power, and Carnera had a glass jaw. Against great punchers, he got destroyed. Carnera will stand right in front of Marciano. He ain't making it past round 8 If you actually think Marciano struggles here, then we have nothing to discuss. We don't see eye to eye in boxing if you think carmera gives Marciano a competitive fight
You explain it, he will keep this imaginary vendetta going, ad infinitum, it's getting rather tedious now.atsch
It doesn't have to be competitive, Carnera could theoretically spoil and hold his way through to the end.You've got it bad Suzie.Take a chill pill.
I got it bad? Dude you have this imaginary super hero you made up in your mind about a prime Dempsey. It's sad. Your vision is so clouded you can't see the glaring weaknesses in his career and resume. I give Marciano a fair rating all time..7th. Most fans and experts would agree with my placement You on the other hand place Jack Dempsey number 2 or 3 all time. That is absolute madness, homerism at its finest. It's even sadder when you look at your ranking of joe Louis..4th all time? Behind Jack Dempsey? It's so ludicrous I can't even fathom such an opinion