Golovkin/Lemieux PPV Price

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by abuffy, Aug 6, 2015.


  1. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    243,562
    237,724
    Nov 23, 2013
    Since I'm not a rat, and don't like the idea of exposing PM's I won't post it

    ...but here's the gist of it, you did ask if Linares was a good bet and I told you that he was, and then you argued that Linares had a glass jaw and you didn't think he'd win and was a risky pick and then I told you to go with him because in spite of how good Mitchell looked against Estrada, Estrada wasn't that great and that Mitchell was KO'd by featherfists like Katsidis and Burns and Linares had too much power and he would lose by KO, and I told you to not the under because there were no guarantees.
     
  2. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,076
    15,772
    Jul 25, 2014
    wtf? i definitely never wrote i didnt think linares would win, copy paste that pm, it's fine, i dont care. but copy paste the previous ones leading up to it too.
     
  3. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    243,562
    237,724
    Nov 23, 2013
    Well who and what did bet on, but the match went over the under and Linares won.
     
  4. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,076
    15,772
    Jul 25, 2014
    dude there's no ****ing way I said I don't think Linares will win. I did however might have said he was a "risky" pick due to durability, and stoppages he had, but there's no way I said I think Mitchell will win, and Linares wont.

    copy paste that pm, i want to see it, and dont edit it lmao, if it sounds like total bs, im gonna ask you to screen shot it and post it on the lounge.
     
  5. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,076
    15,772
    Jul 25, 2014
    Dude reasoning with an autistic individual like yourself who asks a million questions is far more annoying :lol:. If you read through that thread you'll clearly see me answering all your questions, and you ignoring any question I ask, and asking another set of questions.
     
  6. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    243,562
    237,724
    Nov 23, 2013
    You were leaning Linares and you wanted some reassurance because you had fears his chin would give way.

    For the record I would repost it, but I have it on paper because I compiled and printed out a s*** load of PM's the other day because my PM box has been full for about the last 4 months, and I delete 3 or 4 and fills up to 100 again. And that would require me scanning the printed page and then copying an d pasting and I don't care that much.
     
  7. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,076
    15,772
    Jul 25, 2014
    Exactly, so if I was leaning towards Linares why would I say I don't think he's going to win? And all that **** about not wanting to be a rat was bs :lol:.
    Anyways the point is if you did help me out it was already AFTER the fact that I said i was leaning toward Linares. If you really want to know who helped me make this bet the most it was Hans and Lepin. I saw that he bet a huge chunk on Linares(while I was already leaning towards Linares), and even though I find the guy annoying as ****, he makes pretty good safe bets, so I bet a decent amount on it. Lepin on the otherhand bet a good amount on Mitchell, obviously the smart move woudl be go with my instincts and the better picker right? Trust me dude, if you were the reason why I bet on Linares I'd give you credit.
     
  8. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,076
    15,772
    Jul 25, 2014
    Instead of saying, Oh I was wrong, you didn't directly say Kovalev was a slugger, but you were saying that casual fans or people who don't watch boxing much rather see Kovalev's style which is closer to a slugger, than Ward who is more of a technical boxer, you kept going on and on with questions hoping to get a win.

    Are you saying I didn't answer any of your questions :lol:. I was answering them till you decided not to answer the one where I said, "I answer all of your questions, yet you always seem to avoid mine, so let's see if you can answer this simple one. Can you name me all the other technical boxers that are a draw? Of course you're going to ignore it."

    After that I couldn't be bothered educating you anymore.
     
  9. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,076
    15,772
    Jul 25, 2014
  10. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    243,562
    237,724
    Nov 23, 2013
    Regardless you've asked for my advice a few times and I'm happy to give it, keep on asking, and then don't insult me about my ****ing vcash I'm 35 years old, I think vcash is actually stupid as s*** especially when you act like that's indicative of Boxing knowledge. I bet huge amounts on the underdogs in impossible to win or very risky picks that usually don't win BECAUSE ITS NOT REAL MONEY :deal

    In my real life I'd never put 300 on Bika beating Stevenson but thankfully its Fantasy.:deal
     
  11. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,076
    15,772
    Jul 25, 2014
    Dude the reason why I'm fking around with you about this v cash ****, is because I've never brought up v cash to you once. Yet the first time you pass me you bring up vcash right away lmao I know you did it jokingly, but it's just funny how you never brought it up once when I had more. And you're right v cash doesn't determine knowledge, but you definitely do need some knowledge to have loads of v cash unless you're a mod that gives himself like 100k v cash.

    I never denied that you gave me advice, but when it went for boxers I had no clue about like Mitchell/Estrada and Teper/Price you got those picks both wrong for me lol. As for reassurance, whether you reassured me or not I was probably going to bet on that guy either way.
     
  12. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    243,562
    237,724
    Nov 23, 2013
    No I didn't... Dos Huevos did and I said I had 16 more jokingly....who cares calm down.:conf
     
  13. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,076
    15,772
    Jul 25, 2014
    I was saying it jokingly too, what annoyed me was you saying that you were the sole reason why I picked Linares, and you basically are the one that informed me to pick him. Then you went on and claimed that I said "I don't think Linares will win", which means I picked Mitchell.
     
  14. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    243,562
    237,724
    Nov 23, 2013
    No you picked Linares after I reassured you along with Hans and lep putting vcash on him, I'm sleepy and maybe my typing and wording off, regardless I've helped you out with advice and I still will ....move on.
     
  15. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    243,562
    237,724
    Nov 23, 2013
    For the record moparfan and I are working on a theory, what is your astrological sign Ellerbe and while I'm at it yours too Aquamarine?