Valuev fought guys like kevin Rosier with 17 losses and 7 wins..his best win over someone with legit talent and size was was Jameel McCline and a 46 year old holyfield...he retired b/c he eventually had to step up with guys like Haye and Vitali waiting to mug him around the corner after that loss....its a complete joke to compare Tyson to him.Also Tyson vs smith was Tysons only second year as a pro..valuev fought bums up until his last 2 years as a fighter.Valuev would nt even beat Mitch Blood Green!:yep
The only plausible explaination for such a dumb post is you must be related to Valuev,theres a difference between opinion and being totally out of sync with reality in you think being 7 feet tall saves him with a Tyson like fighter..luckily he is not 8 feet tall then you would have him on king kongs level.....:verysad
Well, Valuev has every measurable quality over Tyson. Sheer power, Height, and weight. His reach was longer, his frame could carry more muscle. He was also given more modern training.
And Tyson's career at his supposed devastating best in 88 was a mere 3 years old, your point is? Tyson fought the likes of Eddie Ricardson and went life and death with James Tillis, a fighter with 42 wins and 22 losses. Tyson retired after being embarrassed by Kevin McBride, a fighter that was half a foot shorter than Valuev...
lol...you have to be the worst poster I ever came across and that's pretty bad,no offense,i actually think its hilarious,its all good!
It appears that these people are not trolls and are actually arguing Valuev's case. Quite a remarkable happening.
Just when I thought the boxing scene forums would never be outdone with stupidity of many posters there,well I have been proven wrong. :scaredas:
Is this serious? Tyson would give Valuev a sustained beating. Valuev's mass may allow him to see the final bell but this would be brutal especially to the body for him.