/end thread. Who could possibly forget wen he took on the fearsome Michael Jennings for his vacant wbo title?
Not so fast grasshopper. Cotto is and experienced top level elite fighter. They are the same age almost and Cotto has done a hell of a lot more than GGG has. Cotto can bang and I promise that that fight will be at a catch weight or it won't happen at all.:good GGG better get to draining down if he beats David for the IBF belt.
Based off what koing subpar fighters? I'd pick Alvarez over GGG all day too much speed and too much skill. Everybody looks good fighting journeymen and while I do think GGG could handle some of the top fighters around his weight class acting like he's unbeatable is ridiculous. Vs GGG's best opponent Geale Cotto looked the same as GGG which tells me nothing Golovkin has been doing is that impressive.
Cotto faced a drained Geale, Golovkin beat a Geale at his comfortable weight. Stop pretending that a drained Geale is superior to a 160 minimum one. There is a REASON why Cotto wanted no part of a Geale weighing at 160.
Where exactly would naming the actual animal in this context make a bit of sense? It wouldn't. Now move along and be a good boy. :hi:
:good Absolutely this. If there was no difference between a drained Geale and a regular 160 Geale, then why insist on the weight drain? Clearly, draining too much weight affects performance. Geale looked like death warmed up at that weigh in. He's lucky that a stray funeral he**** didn't pop him into a casket after mistaking him for a corpse. Ffs, there's probably healthier looking zombies walking around.
Cotto is paying Golovkin step aside money rather than fight him, afterall, Golovkin is Cotto's mandatory....................Golovkin will knock Cotto or Alvarez out as he will be the mandatory for the winner.....................Pac knocked Cotto out and he is a midget..............
The funny thing is even with the cw all the talk was that Geale was a real MW and would show Cotto he didn't belong up until he got beatdown that is. I thought Geale was the #2 MW, one of the best then the ass whopping happened and then he was always a bum. If your being honest Geale wasn't **** when GGG fought him wasn't **** when Cotto did either.
Golovkin will roll over Cotto like a D9 bulldozer. He will pop him like a g****. And Cotto knows it. Look, let's be fair - kudos to Cotto for going as high as 160. But he's too small for 160 and needs to go back to a realistic weight class for him. Stop holding the damn belts hostage!
I think Geale is pretty good. Just doesn't have the power to go with his skills. Drained Geale, however, was a shadow of himself. He was there vs Cotto for a payday, that's all.
"cotto faced a drained geale....ggg beat geale at a comfortable weight" guarantee you dont say the same thing about pac/floyd and oscar....t.hats the problem with ggg fans...ur just like pac fans....thats why you are met with resistance in regards to ggg.....because u dont hold ggg to the same standards you hold others to and you act like ggg operates differently than the average fighter...he doesnt....hes all about money and risk/reward too