Lomachenko Explodes on Rigondeaux (Wants To Be Crowned THE Champion)

I don't, the fight was about to be made and I picked Loma and easily then, it doesn't change for me. If they don't fight at 126 they'll fight at 130 at some point anyway, I'll make a ban bet with you if you want?

 

Lol imagine if a fighter showed more interest in Ward over Kessler...

Shame on that fighter!

 

Nobody called Loma a coward, he's not. I think most of the debate comes from Loma dismissing Walters and wanting to fight Rigo and the alleged hypocrisy behind it.

This fight should happen soon, at the full 126 lbs limit WITHOUT a rehydration clause.

 

There's nothing wrong with calling out a smaller fighter IF you doesnt care to go to fight to his weight, OR a fair catchweight (no belt involved). And that's not actually calling out a smaller fighter. Any other behaviour is lame "i'll fight you but only if i have huge advantage". Lame.

 

Who's better Rigo or Walters?

 

I don't favor Walters but I don't really see how people defending Rigondeaux on the weight issue against Lomachenko are displaying little faith but those who are doing so for Lomachenko against Walters aren't. Especially since that fight is and was loads more realistic than this one.

 

They are the same people who want GGG to move all the way up and fight Ward at 168. and then expect Kovalev to move down for Ward.

See a trend yet???

 

Who's better chocolatito or wilder? fight wilder then.atsch

 

Now you're just being ridiculous... I didn't ask you who's bigger! I asked who's better? It's almost negligible anyway the size difference, a midget's a midget! They buzz around (up & down) the small weight classes with common regularity.. We are not talking Wlad v Golovkin here! We are talking about a guy who fights at 126lbs with a 65inch reach against another who fight's at 122lbs with a 66inch reach & you talk like it's ridiculous & irregular lol Get a sense of perspective you bloody drama queens! I **** 4lbs...

Why is Rigondeaux picking on fighter's with a smaller reach than him? Disgraceful..

 

It's not the weight, if people said Loma should compromise if he wants to call out Rigo that'd be fine by me, but they seem to be trying to deflect from this fight by mentioning Walters? As if Lomachenko is ducking him or something? And almost in hope that Rigo fight doesn't happen, that's why I said it.

 

Rigo picking on fighter's with a smaller reach than him?

Sir, you have no ff..... idea about boxing.

Edit: actually it has nothing to do with knowing about boxing or not. Sir, you are blind. That's more accurate.

 

No the reason for bringing up Walters is precisely in connection to the compromise. If he doesn't want to concede advantages to Walters because of the weight, fine, but it looks like he's then demanding he himself be afforded similar advantages over Rigondeaux when he refuses to compromise.

 

Fair enough, if that's your reasoning I have no problem with that. But I hope you don't actually think Loma-Walters is the better fight and that's the fight you want to happen because that'd be utterly ludicrous to me as a boxing fan.

 

You actually took that literally! What a strange character u are

I have no idea of boxing?! You just spent 3 pages whining about size (4lbs) & not once alluded to Rigondeauxs skill set, speed or whatever else he can bring! Which is the main factor in this clash! You then cite his supposed reluctance to fight Walters! A man who has made his name doing the exact same thing you are criticising Lomachenko for now! Pursuing a slightly smaller fighter! LOL Damn u people are thick...

& if Lomachenko is wrong for wanting Rigo then wouldn't that make 130 Walters wrong for wanting 126 Lomachenko?! You just pawn yourselves over & over...

 

I'm not fan of walters. Lol, for walter wanting lomawho? lol, ONE POUND, that's the difference, and was just once, that he missed the weight. And you still consider 10 pounds difference is fair. You, lomawho fans, are a joke.

Edit: still i think lomawho would beat walters.