How can people say Golovkin is a hype job, but Broner isn't?

LOL, ahead and name them, I'll wait. The last four guys DeMarco lost to, Barthalemy*, Vargas, Broner, and Valero were all undefeated world champs.

*Kind of.

 

Broner is simply better and more accomplished compared to Bumluvkin.

Broner moving up from SFW to LW and knocking out Demacro is like GGG moving up right now and knocking out James DeGale. Then Broner moved up 2 more divisions and SD Malignaggi which is like GGG moving up to Cruiserweight and SD Huck before the loss.

No comparison.

 

Because you GGG apologist are full of **** and you already know what happens if GGG gets in the ring with Ward.:deal The guys isn't the machine you and others make him out to be because if you honestly believed it you would be calling for Ward's head on a silver platter and GGG's team doesn't think so either.

 

Dawson called out Ward at 168 and said he could make the weight no problems. Ward didn't call out GGG at 160 big difference there. I have no problems with Ward fighting Kovalev at 175 but if he goes there that ruins a fight with GGG. Also Ward has spoken with Kovalev about a fight with him next year at 175.

 

Neither is a hypejob because:

- GGG is a legit elite fighter and the best in his division by a landslide

- nobody believes the Broner hype anymore

 

ggg could still be a hypejob,

hes getting hyped by knocking out bums and cans.
if he loses his first fight against an elite fighter, he will be considered a hypejob

 

Hard to be a hype job when you're the legit # 1 in your division,
Golovkin: Overrated? Possibly, but not a hypejob.

Broner isn't a hype job, he's quite possibly just the worst squanderer of talent
of this era, clearly in the last 15 years. He could've been an elite 130 or 135 guy and dominated for years but was lazy, undedicated, unfocused and just an all around piece of **** guy. His skillset in his appropriate weight class where he had size, speed and power advantages suggests it wasn't hype, whether you personally like him or not (and I don't)

 

why would a loss make him a hypejob????

 

GGG is the real deal

 

Who said that?

 

because hes been hyped for beating tomato cans

 

The real question is... How can you seriously take to heart what ret@rds say on this forum????? Think about that!

 

Why does it ruin it? He can just come back down to 168 no? I mean you said similar with GGG.

He can just go up, fight Ward and come back down!