Do you give Zale a pass for fighting graziano over number 1 rated Lamotta?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Aug 24, 2015.


  1. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,583
    Nov 24, 2005
    Zale joined the Navy in March 1942 and didn't get out until October 1945.

    Your "greatest era in middleweight history" seems to overlap with the time so many young men and boxers were tied up in the armed forces. To me that seems highly unlikely.


    Don't be silly. He LOST loads of fights on his way up and had to adjust and improve and test himself again and again to reach championship class. That's the opposite of being "untested".
     
  2. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005

    Lamotta fought Robinson, 6 times. Including defending his title against him.

    Sands? Who the hell was that

    Lamotta was one of the only white middleweights of the era to take on the black murderers row Lyell Williams Marshall. He lost some of those fights, but he had the guts to take them on. Lamotta stated in an interview he and Maxim should get more credit for fighting all the dangerous black fighters no one wanted to fight.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,482
    26,002
    Jan 3, 2007
    There are some people who will never be content until the reigning champion fights seven times per year and against the #1 mandatory every single time. Its just not how reality works.
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,583
    Nov 24, 2005
    Good. I don't want you to go anywhere.
    I'm just saying, your recent constant threads on Zale, and before that on Dempsey, have been boring a lot of postors. I know that because I read the responses (and note the lack of responses on some of the threads).
    It seems excessive.


    I don't think anyone is telling you to rate him highly.
     
  5. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,583
    Nov 24, 2005
    :good

    This is what I don't understand.

    In the case of Tony Zale, he was champ for about 18 months before war interrupted his career. In that time he was supposed to defend against "murderer's row" ? :lol:

    4 years in the Navy.
    And when he came out of the Navy he needed money and fortunately had a huge gate attraction to defend against, so he did.

    Somehow those basic facts have been twisted into him ducking about 10 ATGS
     
  6. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005

    I'm not asking for that.

    I'm asking in the greatest era in middeleweight history, for him to fight just ONE of the middleweight greats of the era. Just one

    I also believe a champion should fight his number 1 contender immediately, then he can take on a few lower rates voluntary guys..but must first take care of his number 1 contender

    The way Wlad does it is picture perfect, he's put together one of the best reigns of all time
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005

    Well about 6 or 7 ATGs were around in his era, in his weight class. He didn't fight one of them.
     
  8. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,583
    Nov 24, 2005
    I suppose it's possible that Zale was behind the Pearl Harbor attacks, he planned the whole thing with the Japs so he could sit on the title instead of fighting Holman Williams.
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005
    "Good. I don't want you to go anywhere.
    I'm just saying, your recent constant threads on Zale, and before that on Dempsey, have been boring a lot of postors. I know that because I read the responses (and note the lack of responses on some of the threads).
    It seems excessive. "

    Well I respect your opinion so I will tone it down a bit. But I tend to get strict and heavily critical on certain old timers who I feel get grossely overhyped and overrated today because they either drew the color line, or avoided the best fighters out there.
     
  10. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005
    :lol: that's funny

    But why couldn't Zale fight them from 39-42 or 46-48?
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,583
    Nov 24, 2005
    It depends who you call an ATG.
    Are you saying he never fought a single ATG his entire career ?
     
  12. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005
    It seems like people are saying the black murderers row were the unluckiest fighters of all time. For they all peaked only in the years 43-45 and wouldn't have made good fights from 39-41 and post war 46-50

    Why couldn't he fit them pre and post war?
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005
    No. He fought billy conn one of the best of all time.

    That's the only one
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,849
    29,295
    Jun 2, 2006

    Sands was the no2 rated contender in1949 and the number 3 in1950 that's who the hell he was.

    You slag off Graziano for fighting welterweights ,which he did, then in your very next post, you praise Lamotta for fighting Robinson 6 times!
    What the f*ck was Robinson if not a welterweight!
    How about the 4 fights Lamotta had with welterweight Fritzie Zivic? The ones with welters George Sugar Costner,Tommy Bell
    ,California Jackie Wilson, and one with Jimmy Edgar when Edgar weighed 149lbs?
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,849
    29,295
    Jun 2, 2006
    The only one of them rated before Zale went into the Navy was Charles.