Ellerbe: "Berto Is 3 & 3 In His Last 6. So Is Pac!"

rightfully so...

 

It's the truth but what sets them apart is the caliber of the opponents.

 

Yeah because their opponents are of a similar standard.

 

Berto lost to Karass, Guerrero, and Ortiz. Pac lost to Bradley, Marquez, and Mayweather. I fail to see the similarities.

 

Ellerbe has a point, as always

 

He's 4 and 2 and there's no shame losing to Dinamita in a stone wall classic and Mayweather is a fellow ATG, Berto has fallen at the hurdle against much less esteemed fighters lol.

 

Manny didn't lose to Time Bradley.

 

4-3 in his last 7, no matter how Pac****s try to spin this.

It's either you accept the Tim loss or the JMM loss.

Everyone knows they robbed JMM in 3, it was ludicrous.

 

Only the Mayweather fans can swallow the bull**** Ellerbe is saying.

 

But what he's saying is fact, it's not wrong. :yep

 

Man, I saw some great threads from your part and you know boxing. But ATM, you're simply trolling you know better than that. Pacquiao and Berto had different level of opposition and as for the first Pacquiao-Bradley, it is clear as day that Arum robbed Pacquiao since he probably wanted to build a new cash cow. Losing to Soto-Karass, without taking anything from him, is pretty weak if you're supposed to be an "elite" fighter. Berto doesn't deserve a fight with Mayweather.

 

I thought the sarcasm of that post would be obvious to anyone who read it. Apparently not.

 

Look, no one is saying Berto's opponents are of the same class as Manny's :yep.

ALL I'm saying is that what he's saying is not wrong, they are both 3-3 in their last 6. Come on now.

Manny is far far better than Berto, it's not close, but what Ellerbe saying is fact.

That is all I'm saying. :yep

Ellerbe is just stirring the pot.