Harry Greb-Walker film 1978?

1. I never have and neither has Kurt or anyone else because it wasn't filmed.

2. I did. Just like I pointed out that it wasn't Greb-Gans as soon as he changed his story.

3. No. I don't.

I don't care about the people or their supposed accomplishments because that didn't stop them from being stupid enough to say they thought this footage was of Greb with absolutely no evidence. Its ridiculous.

Look, here is a young Charley Burley knocking down a middleweight:

[url]http://i1184.photobucket.com/albums/z335/klompton/vlcsnap-2014-09-10-13h19m26s240_zpsfc931fd4.png[/url]

Its not, but I can say whatever I want and you cant prove me wrong. Ive even got more proof that that still is from a film of Charley Burley than Kurt has that his film is of Greb BUT truth be told I have no idea who that is. I didn't just go into the film hoping it was someone and then build a tenuous case for it being so. You have to find actual facts to establish what it is, not just find the similarities that support your contention and reject anything that doesn't, which is what is going on here. He has given nothing specific to support this and neither have any of the people he claims support him. What tells you this is Pennsylvania? What tells you this is Wilkes-Barre? What tells you this is the ballpark where Greb fought Gans. What tells you this is 1926? What tells you that's Greb? What tells you that's Gans? What tells you that's an actual fight and not an exhibition, amateur bout, or sparring match? What tells you its nighttime and not day? He cant answer any of those questions and you would need to answer a lot of those questions to identify this. Bull**** about "facial recognition" "chest splits" and "inoculation marks" are laughable. Lets pretend for one instant that you could possibly see an inoculation mark on the white fighter in that poor quality film. You know who else had an inoculation mark in addition to Greb? Damn near everyone. My mom has one, maybe that film is of her. My dad has one, maybe its a film of him. My grandfather and Grandmother had one? So do both of my uncles. So did my other two grandparents. If Greb's head is so uniquely shaped that you can recognize him in a film shot from several rows back why did Kurt mistake Tillie Kid Herman for him in a film that was labeled and shot right from ringside, close up??? Like I said above, where was this supposed forensic expert then? I could do this all day but you coming back here and simply WANTING to believe this whopper story is true from a proven liar or more likely just wanting to argue or troll like someone else who keeps following me around because he has nothing better to do, isn't proving your case any better than Kurt did.

 

The films on You Tube you ****!atsch And you're on here arguing the toss about the authenticity of a film you haven't seen.OMG!atsch I bought it as part of a compilation called Ring Classics years ago , when you would have been in diapers!
A taller jabber could give Langford some trouble? Like Fred Fulton ?
It get's worse.:yikes

 

You have difficulty disitinguishing between them ,you
insist on calling the Johnson/ Smith sparring session an "ex match".

When did Greb ever spar with Bill Tate, what would be the point?

 

So you're saying there's a chance!

(I kid, I kid.)

 

I've worked out that if Bill Tate shrunk 8 inches in the film then Harry Greb must be 5ft 0" relatively speaking. It could be Baby Jake Matlala??

 

You sir are a moron. I purchased the DVD Langford vs Lang from Sweet fights, among others long before it was on you tube.

Stop commenting on what you have not seen!!! A bystander might believe you.

Watch Langford on film and you'll see a taller jabber could bother him at a distance. And yes, Langford's gloves are over stuffed in the match. You see I watch films, you rely on books.

If boxing people I know tell me something, why would they lie?

Now stop soiling this thread.

 

Scorecard:

So its essentially 9 in favor the film is real, 1 with one not sure, and the one ( Klompton ) who said no.

The trouble the 9 who saw the film said yes, and 1 person ( Klompton who has not seen the film ) said no.

 

I bought the film on super 8mm in the 1960's, from Black Hawk.
You brought the subject up not me, I merely replied.

I'VE GOT THE FILM, CAN YOU GRASP THAT? atsch

Why would they lie ?

Why do you lie, incessantly and compulsively?

 

Originally Posted by Mendoza
You sir are a moron. I purchased the DVD Langford vs Lang from Sweet fights, among others long before it was on you tube.

Stop commenting on what you have not seen!!! A bystander might believe you.

Watch Langford on film and you'll see a taller jabber could bother him at a distance. And yes, Langford's gloves are over stuffed in the match. You see I watch films, you rely on books.

If boxing people I know tell me something, why would they lie?

Now stop soiling this thread.

Are you talking about Langford vs Lang?

Then why did you say on post 120??!!

[url]http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=299603&page=8[/url]

LIAR! Now go silk away...and get some help fast.:deal

 

Mcvey

 

Before this can be accepted as a genuine Greb fight certain proof is necessary. Klompton has gone into some detail about identifying the film if the owner wants to sell this for big bucks why would he not be prepared to give that proof?
Your opinion is irrelevant , you still say you've seen Langford v Hague and that the real Fitzsimmons v Ruhlin fight was filmed. You are automatically dsq'd from any discussion in which the word TRUTH , is mentioned.

 

Mcvey, You were caught in a LIE about Langford vs Lang. STFU and get out. I archived this in in case you delete. Go ahead and delete or edit it. That would only prove you shameful

You too said you saw Langford vs Hauge! FACT.

Let me guess you lied then too or simply have no clue about what you are seeing?

 

You f*cking Moron I bought the Langford Lang fight ,years ago probably before you were born, I gave it to a friend,when the subject of the Langford v Hague fight came up I said I had seen it.Klompton assured me I hadn't and we had a heated argument about it I phoned my friend and a couple of weeks later he found the film and said it was titled Ring Classics from Black Hawk Films and the only Langford fight listed on it was versus Bill Lang.I then made a public admission on this forum that I was wrong . What do you think you have on me you IMBECILE!atsch Get some one to read it for you, you f*cking reta*rd!
Silk away ? Can't read, can't spell , cant tell the truth ,cant argue, what the f*ck is the point of you?

Anyone doubting me has only to trawl back through my posts .

F*ck me! What with the fan boys and liars this forum is gone to the dogs.:-(

 

Then why did you say you have not seen Langford vs Lang? Explain this to me? Your so compromised and trying to squirm out. If you have seen it you would NEVER say you have not. I suggest you do not post here for a while and let this thread sink to hide your shame.

Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar Liar