If Pac Wasnt Injured Would he Had Won?

it doesnt matter. they got paid well. they both won

 

There's already 357 threads on this.

 

flo-os cant get over floyds pathetic performance. they need others reassurance that floyd won the fight

 

Hell to naw naw naw

 

Uhm. I've already said that with two arms Pacquiao would lose. I've said he'd lose worse in a rematch long before the first fight ever happened. Nice try though.

 

No speed advantage, mid-range fighter and couldn't establish his distance, can't cut off the ring, over complicated strategy (Mayweather was simply himself), took all of his attention to reduce Mayweather's accuracy whilst landing a pitiful amount of his own shots, ultra cautious and hesitant after the two right hand counters in 1, ineffective pursuing him aimlessly to the ropes, no size advantage, couldn't avoid the clinches and has never excelled in fighting out of them.

 

I give the 2015 version of Pac a 40% chance of beating Mayweather if there are no injuries. I give the 2009 version of Pac a 60% chance.

 

He wasn't injured, so there you go.

 

I wasn't aware his feet were injured? Because that was the major issue.

 

Manny already won with one arm. Vegas judges give Floyd points for running.

All he did was run.

 

I thought that wouldn't be an issue? Remember? Manny had the faster feet and the better footwork. :rofl At least that's what all the numbskulls supporting Pacquiao were saying. Even Pac: "You can run but you can't hide."

What happened? Oh yea, reality happened.

 

Manny needs sal****er buckets with the blood of Jesus poured on him in order to beat Floyd.