Many, including Manny and his team, his fans and Skip Bayless have said that if Pac didn't suffer a shoulder injury he would of beat Floyd. Then others say Mayweather waited to fight Manny and now that he is "old" (Floyd is older, btw) Floyd knew he could beat him now. Others say he loss cause it was in Vegas and the judges, refs, fans, and commission love Floyd more than Manny and wouldn't let him lose even if he did. It seems to me that all of these can't be the reason Manny loss, is it one or the other or just an attempt of the Pac faithful to cover every base?
Yeah but this one will end them all, I just want to hear you say one more time that with two arms Manny would win, then watch you come up with a new excuse after he gets schooled again
flo-os cant get over floyds pathetic performance. they need others reassurance that floyd won the fight
Uhm. I've already said that with two arms Pacquiao would lose. I've said he'd lose worse in a rematch long before the first fight ever happened. Nice try though.
No speed advantage, mid-range fighter and couldn't establish his distance, can't cut off the ring, over complicated strategy (Mayweather was simply himself), took all of his attention to reduce Mayweather's accuracy whilst landing a pitiful amount of his own shots, ultra cautious and hesitant after the two right hand counters in 1, ineffective pursuing him aimlessly to the ropes, no size advantage, couldn't avoid the clinches and has never excelled in fighting out of them.
I give the 2015 version of Pac a 40% chance of beating Mayweather if there are no injuries. I give the 2009 version of Pac a 60% chance.
I thought that wouldn't be an issue? Remember? Manny had the faster feet and the better footwork. :rofl At least that's what all the numbskulls supporting Pacquiao were saying. Even Pac: "You can run but you can't hide." What happened? Oh yea, reality happened.