OK I give up, I am wasting my breath and time with Americans, they are just too americocentric... biased in other words, America is still shytting on Darcy,,, he did enough while he was alive to be ranked well above Lytell................ this will never end until his name is wiped from history and I am sick of it.. Lytell wouldn't have lasted two rounds with a 20 year old Darcy.
Hey why don't we just count only american boxers here,, it will be so much easier eh...... Aussie boxers are the new blacks of boxing
Because there's an Argentine that could make the #1 spot and a Nigerian that could make the top 10? :rofl
You may be Scottish but you have bought into the americans are always superior boxers no matter what club I think
Apart from all time p4p, where I have a Canadian at #1, controversially, and I believe for the first time "in print" in about 100 years.
This is what I ended up with, gents: 01 - Harry Greb 02 - Carlos Monzon 03 - Marvin Hagler 04 - Sugar Ray Robinson 05 - Stanley Ketchel 06 - Mike Gibbons 07 - Bernard Hopkins 08 - Charley Burley 09 - Tommy Ryan 10 - Holman Williams 11 - Freddie Steele 12 - Jake LaMotta 13 - **** Tiger 14 - Bob Fitzsimmons 15 - Jack Dempsey 16 - Fred Apotoli 17 - Teddy Yarosz 18 - Mickey Walker 19 - Jack Dillon 20 - Tiger Flowers 21 - Ken Overlin 22 - Joey Giardello 23 - Billy Papke 24 - Gene Fullmer 25 - Mike O'Dowd 26 - Les Darcy 27 - Bert Lytell 28 - Frank Klaus 29 - Emile Griffith 30 - Nino Benvenuti 31 - Lloyd Marshall 32 - James Toney 33 - Tony Zale 34 - Billy Conn 35 - Roy Jones Jnr. 36 - Michael Nunn 37 - Randy Turpin 38 - Marcel Cerdan 39 - Georgie Abrams 40 - Mike McCallum 41 - Jeff Smith 42 - Young Corbett III 43 - Charles McCoy 44 - Sumbu Kalambay 45 - Bobo Olson 46 - Marcel Thil 47 - Jack Chase 48 - Jermain Taylor 49 - Cocoa Kid 50 - Hugo Kelly
How so? Sure: Mike Gibbons is a total anomaly, a white fighter who was clearly the best in the world in his weight division for a concerted spell who never became the champion. He laid claim to the title, like so many others in the wake of Stanley Ketchels death, but his claim was never recognised as full. Mike was able to tempt three of the men who held the lineal title during his career into the ring at one stage or another. George Chip was the legitimate world champion in 1913 and 1914; Mike met and outclassed him on three separate occasions between 1917 and 1919. Al McCoy was the man who took the title from Chip. Three months before he did so, McCoy faced Mike. According to The Pittsburgh Press, McCoy landed three or four punches in ten uneventful but one-sided rounds which were hissed and booed by those in attendance. This may have been a part of Mikes problem: he was a defensive specialist, the St.Paul Phantom a fighter almost impossible to hit and given to taking protracted breaks even against world-class opposition, especially in no contests where no official decision was being rendered. McCoy reigned for three years and despite his clear superiority over the new champion, Mike was never rewarded with a title fight. I will meet McCoy any time, was the line he parroted throughout that reign but it would be Mike ODowd who ended the McCoy title-run. Against ODowd, Mike enjoyed less dominance, dropping a twelve round decision in the twilight of the career and swapping newspapers decisions with the brutal champion prior to that. Against fellow uncrowned champion Harry Greb he managed a laudable 1-1, although it should be noted that Greb, while far from green, improved considerably after the first meeting between the two, a six-rounder fought in February of 1917. Two newspaper decisions rendered over Jack Dillon and three over Jeff Smith in what appear to have been fascinating if sometimes slow encounters nail him down as great but his resume has enormous depth to go with these quality wins. Willie Brennan, Gus Christie, Bob Moha, Jimmy Clabby, Eddie McGoorty and Leo Houck, among others, fell to his stylings at some time or other. A veteran of more than 130 fights, he was never stopped, a granite jaw barracking that legendary defence. Had he been champion he would have cracked the top five. Count them: three losses in more than a hundred fights. It is a true rarity to see so few losses in any centurion but Tommy Ryan was likely as brilliant and dominant a fighter as has ever lived. The first of those losses came against the great Kid McCoy in 1896. Ryan was in his prime, but he was in his welterweight prime, and he weighed just 148lbs. Although he was crushed by McCoy it needs to be remembered that the Kid would go on to become a significant force at both light-heavyweight and heavyweight and that he carried a significant size advantage into their fight. The second was suffered via a disqualification against George Green, the foul blow reported alternatively as a light blow struck on Greens shoulder when he was down and a knee delivered to the face as Green crumpled before Ryans assault. Finally, he was beaten by heavyweight Denver Ed Martin in his final fight which has all the appearance of being an exhibition. He dropped a six round newspaper-decision to the big man having come out of retirement after a four year hiatus. He was forty-one years old. Other than that, its just glory and greatness and the only factor that determines how highly he rates in the divisions he graced is identifying when he should be credited as a welterweight and when he should be credited as a middleweight. For me, Ryans middleweight prime stretches from 1897 through to 1904 and his draw with Philadelphia Jack OBrien; most primes are barracked by losses but Ryan was all but invincible at middleweight, and seemed literally so during his middleweight prime. Perhaps his eras definitive technical genius, he is said to have schooled both Jim Jeffries and, more surprisingly, the supposed Grandfather of Boxing James J Corbett on the finer points of boxing technique, but he was also one of the toughest middleweights in history. An orphan, the story goes that he wound up in Michigan s****ping his fellow newsboys for territory in semi-professional contests that morphed into a boxing career. Skin gloves and cobbles wrought a fighter carved of stone as he proved in defeating Tommy West in perhaps the bloodiest fight in boxing history. As well as innate toughness, he proved himself a wilting puncher scoring knockouts, some of them early, in the majority of his title defences. A shot Jack Dempsey, the legendarily filthy Mysterious Billy Smith, West and Kid Carter were among the best to fall to him during the eight years during which he was almost universally recognised as the middleweight champion. His was not an era of great strength but his consistent and extended dominance over it brings him in here just ahead of the mercurial Williams.
Solid ****ysis. These are two guys that I rate heavily pound 4 pound, but find hard to place relative to great middleweights. You have given them a high rating in this category, and you have given a compelling justification.
Very good list. My one quibble would be Steele being placed that high. I would drop him into the low twenties. But this is an excellent effort on a sweeping topic.
Please explain to me how Hopkins is that high and above Steele? Roughly the same number of MW fights, Steele did it in 1/4 the amount of time with a much tougher schedule, was more dominant against way better competition and the only losses he took were against better MW's (minus RJJ) with an injury. All Hopkins has is consistency and Steele trumps him in that department in addition to eclipsing him in everything else. Seems inexplicable. :roll: