How exactly is Cotto holding the Belt hostage?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by acie2g, Aug 31, 2015.


  1. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    4
    Apr 14, 2014
    An even better question is; exactly WHO has Bumlovkin fought?
     
  2. acie2g

    acie2g Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,738
    1,302
    Jul 21, 2010
    How did Martinez avoid GGG? GGG didn't become somewhat reagent until 2013 when Martinez was injured he came back and lost to Cotto in his next fight?
    Geale is GGG's best win got destroyed the same way by Cotto.

    And when asked Cotto says he has no problem with the fight after Alvarez.

    Remind me again how GGG even got his title? Maybe old ass Strum or Quillin and you'd have a point but Cotto taking a tuneup to adjust to his 4th Weight Class and now the biggest fight in boxing isn't ducking. Neither is fighting the Legitimate division champ over a then intriem titlist.
     
  3. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    Both equally bad, taking advantage of star power to weaken their opponents. Frankly, I think it was Pac that taught Cotto this dirty trick.
     
  4. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    then that answers your question about why CW pursuing Cotto is holding the belt hostage. He is reducing the quality of opposition by forcing lifetime middleweights into weights they can not make without draining their strength and reducing them to shadows of themselves.
     
  5. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    GGG is the consensus best at MW. Plus his knees are fine. That makes him by default better than anyone Cotto has fought in MW.

    Cotto got 2 belts against opponents whose knees gave out mid fight. Some achievement this is. He is like a wolf, hunting down the weak and the frail.
     
  6. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    4
    Apr 14, 2014
    Sorry but NO. Cotto KO'ed the legitimate #1 guy in the division as well as KO'ing the guy who represents the best win on Bumlovkin's resume. The Triple Duck is NOT the consensus best guy in the division. Not even close...
     
  7. Palooka

    Palooka Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,343
    42
    Feb 1, 2015
    "Not even close..." Just L O ****ing L at you.
     
  8. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    Lol, the guy is a goon. I think he may be trolling.
     
  9. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    4
    Apr 14, 2014
    How are you the consensus #1 in the division when you have never fought and beaten the best guy there? Exactly HOW does that work, Einstein?
     
  10. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    if he beats the "best guy" there is, he will get criticized by idiots like you for picking on a former WW, and to add to that, the Ring Champion at MW is doing everything in his power NOT to face his #1 challenger and mandatory :patsch
     
  11. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,151
    29,030
    Apr 4, 2005
    I'd agree to an extent. There is no consensus number 1 at middleweight. Golovkin may have been denied his chance at the champion but that doesn't mean he is the champion now.

    Cotto maybe the man who beat the man but Martinez was ready to be taken and had been avoiding the consensus number 2 guy like Cotto is now.

    I think most would favour Golovkin should they fight, he's naturally bigger, hits harder and looks unstoppable at 160lbs but that's not the same as actually beating Cotto.
     
  12. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,151
    29,030
    Apr 4, 2005
    Well that's pretty much guaranteed to happen. It happened to BHop when he beat Tito and I don't expect Golovkin to be any different if he gets his chance against Cotto.

    There is nothing you can do about the haters, Golovkin could go all the way up and become undisputed light heavyweight champion and clean out the division and you'll still have people point out his best win at middleweight was against a former welter and ignore the fact that was the case with BHop, Hagler and Monzon.
     
  13. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    plain and simple agenda, Hopkins' biggest names at 160 are former WW's, yet people bash Golovkin for going after a former WW who's currently Ring and WBC champion at 160 :think
     
  14. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    Who would beat Golovkin at 160. Go.

    You know what never mind. It's not worth arguing w/ u.
     
  15. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    4
    Apr 14, 2014
    Wake me when Bumlovkin beats the #1 guy in his division.