How would Ali beat Vlad?

You metaphorically rubbed my face in urine and want an apology as well? You can't have both.

 

I was hoping you wouldn't catch onto that, my bad. No apology needed. We will stick with rubbing your face in urine :good

See what you get when you try to be reasonable

 

And don't forget the best part. The duck egg from Toronto is cheer leading the re****s who made such moronic claims. Doesn't get much better than that.:rofl:rofl

 

Bruce did a lot more than lifting to enhance his speed and power. You can quote Wong , but Bruce self admitted his favorited exercises were running, cyling and jumping rope.

These are the basic age old training methods. As is weight training.

Now you're saying Lee used modern methods when he was active around the same time as Ali - who you claim Wlad would beat because of 'modern training methods'

 

Exactly...good genetics as well...I don't even know why you bother with this dino..absolutly the worst poster on the forum and there are many winners here believe me!:thumbsup

 

Whoopee do, a PhD in Sports Science. You can also get one in " religious studies " about as useful with about as much prestige. None worth talking about.

They are the kind of people sitting in reception in sports centres, earning peanuts but get to wear a badge with their name on.:roll:

 

did you just call me a duck egg Foxy?

how would you like me to fire a duck egg up your a-s-s with my boot fella?

 

Ali spent from 1963 until 1978 telling everyone he was the greatest ever, getting better with every fight you moronic fool.

Why do you even bother coming on boards mouthing off about things, and people you know less than fukk all about.

Fukkin jesus the imbecilic unclean has just worked that Muhammad Ali had something of an ego.nut:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

You are as stupid as most of these newbies who claim that seeing as athletics have improved boxing must have.

According to you fools the following is garbage


Boxing Illustrated rated the "40 hardest punchers pound for pound in
boxing history" in their April 1993 issue. Here are the top 10.

10. Sandy Saddler
9. Jack Dempsey
8. Joe Louis
7. Earnie Shavers
6. Bob Satterfield
5. Charles Ledoux
4. George Chaney
3. Bob Fitzsimmons
2. Max Baer
1. Jimmy Wilde

because ONLY fighters after 1993 can really punch, and everyone of these guys listed as punchers would be as nothing compared to the top 5 men in their respective divisions post 1993.

or how about

Boxing Scene listed boxings "10 greatest chins" in their 1991 issue. Here
they are in no particular order.


Joe Grim
Tom Sharkey
Jake LaMotta
Rocky Marciano
George Chuvalo
Muhammad Ali
Vito Antuofermo
Randy "Tex" Cobb
Marvin Hagler
Julio Cesar Chavez

I suppose you, crabtwee and the other mong's are going to tell us that ONLY fighters from 1991 onward's have got good chins, and again every top 5 in the above fighters current divisions would spark these guys inside a round or 2.

It doesn't get much more stupid, but I'll give you idiots one thing you are all giving it your best shots.

Boxing has only ever been about hitting, and either not getting hit, or getting hit and ignoring it. The principle has never, or never will change.

Modern training methods, and nutrition are just another means of self appointed " experts " leeching even more money off the fighters.

They are no different to " agents " in football.

So come on then let you newbies bring on these so called facts, and evidence that today's fighters hit harder than those listed above, or that today's fighter have better resistance to punches than the other list. I don't want to hear any of your insignificant drivel about heart rates, protein or sh it like that.

Punching, and taking punches are the 2 most paramount aspects of boxing, so sh it or get off the pot. Names or STFU.

 

yes... like pyometrics which are very modern, and isometrics which are also very modern and in the boxing world, lifting weights is very modern. You said he didnt lift weights, which is wrong. You also said he did not use modern training, which is wrong again. I asked you where you got the information from that he stopped lifting weights and you couldnt answer it. ill leave it at that.

 

don't group all the newbies TOGETHER in one big POT and then put them on trial as a GROUP for everything that was said, unclebedbug is a moron, that's not fair to the other newbies :bbb

wow, are you ever a newbie BULLY Foxy :nono

 

actually this is your argument. but its sarcasm that fails because no one is claiming any of the points that you mentioned.

in fact, you only made yourself look more stupid.

 

How is it modern when it was used 40 years ago?

 

then answer the point.

that makes no sense, its the reverse of sense, its you who eats his pop.

so why did you say the reverse of the truth?

 

no its not.

there are hundreds of sports that have declined, gone into obscurity or even vanished from the face of the earth.
explain these sports have improved if they are now less practised.

explain it now.

 

Woot Herol to the rescue, and just in time

This is getting so good, its like the old sith fighting the new sith :thumbsup