like all sky pundits, they all have a preset agenda, and it comes across loud and clear. I think sky could do with a reshuffle of most of their pundits/commentators to be honest. Paul smith seems to talk sense but has no passion whatsoever. Froch is ok, but struggles to give an unbiased assessment. Jim Watt can be ok, but on the whole chats breeze. I think Jamie moore should be used more. Above all that lets be grateful we don't have teddy atlas, jesus that guy is obsessed with 'going to the kitchen'!
Andy Scott should be the main play by play guy with the likes of Smith/Froch as colour. Watt should be used as a studio pundit from now on in my opinion. Sky also should try and get a trainer on board such as Gary Lockett when his fighters aren't involved on a card. Halling is terrible, he's worse than Farrar on Channel Five and Rawling on Boxnation.
Gark lockett is a good shout, he seems decent enough on BN, i just love a welsh accent, get big enzo and little barry on sky too
He ruined that fight because of that moment. He genuinely ruined Barker's great moment due to his commentary being hilariously awful.
for the amount of sh"*e they get on here there dosent seem to be many signing up? for the record i dont mind jim. halling is bad though, its clear he knows sod all about the game
