80's HW beltholders vs 00's HW beltholders

Rahman
Weaver
Dokes
Coetzee
Spinks
Ruiz
Byrd
Spoon
Smith
Thomas
Chagaev
Haye

So I have it 7-5

 

00's all the way!

 

Winners are...

Rahman
Weaver
Peter
Sanders
Brewster
Ruiz
Byrd
Witherspoon
Smith
Thomas
Chagaev
Tucker

7-5 for the greatest generation.

 

80's 8-4 for me.

 

What, the 70's?

 

The Age of Ruiz

 

8-4 80s with these match ups, but Iggy isn't there and Damiani isn't either. Both were good. Also, I'm not confident in some of my picks like sanders over Coetzee.

 

Why is ESB obsessed with FUKKING Heavyweights? In the greater scheme of things they are shyte. Are the majority of ESB posters big, stupid, slow reacting morons?

There is possibly a very good reason WHY DeLaHoya / Mayweather is / was the highest grossing PPV boxing event of all time. My guess is it was due to the fact that they were NOT big stupid fukwitted Heavyweights, who look, slow, cumbersome, spasticised, and re**rded, the way Heavyweights do.


But it is merely a guess.

 

I deal with imbeciles on a constant basis. I am used to it.

 

I like a lot of these matchups and can see a good number of them going either way. I'm kinda leaning to the 80s crew to come out slightly ahead. On the whole most of them were younger when they primed and when they were motivated ( Not always the case ) they appeared to be in slightly better shape. While the 2000's heavys were a tad bigger, the lost generation still had plenty of size to match them with. You also had a few of those 80s guys who went the 15 round distance and engaged in some memorable wars ( especially mike weaver. ) I see both teams scoring some wins and as mentioned before a lot of these are pick em fights.

 

tate
masquev
dokes
sanders
spinks
page (when he was on)
tubbs
spoon
smith
thomas
chaguev
tucker ....david haye is nothing :deal

 

you really think peter beats prime dokes bro ?

 

yes, since you are the majority of them.