So who was in the wrong here?

"Floyd Mayweather used WADA-banned IV before Manny Pacquiao fight"

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/i...nned-iv-manny-pacquiao-fight-according-report

It's clear as daylight

 

your allowed a 50ml injection once every 6 hours, Floyd had a over 500 ml iv injection, that he did was completely illegal and can be used as a masking agent. And he never reported it. He claims it was due to him being dehydrated but when has mayweather had trouble making 147? its supposed to be his ring weight he keeps telling everyone

WADA allow torodol the substance many wanted to use but the NVSC rejected it, which is weird but not illegal

 

This is not about Manny at the moment. It is about illegal actions and improper conduct which needs to be thoroughly investigated. Congress needs to get involved.

 

500ml is prohibited by WADA which the USADA was mirroring, and whom actually reported the initial incident. NSAC has no protocol for that amount. At the end of the day Mayweather did nothing illegal, and the story stinks to high heaven, so the USADA's collection agent reported it, just so the USADA had a reason to cover it up. Meanwhile what's gonna come out of this is the NSAC is gonna tell the USADA to follow protocol in the future. That's it.

 

Floyd - did use a WADA banned substance
Manny - did NOT use a WADA banned substance

I guess that should clear things up.

 

Floyd did Not use a WADA banned substance the article clearly states that. What he did do was use an IV in a prohibited manner.

 

the amount he used was 10 times over the limit and administered in a prohibited way . 10 times over the limit would indicate its banned

 

How and what amount you use something is part of the legal framework, you can buy uranium core for scientific purposes, you can't buy the amount to make a nuclear bomb. What Floyd did is perfectly illegal.

 

That's you speculating. The story in fact though stated the substance was not banned. That's actually pretty simple.

 

And the TUE was improper since it was given retroactively before reporting it weeks earlier and the nevada commission gives out tues. The USADA is not auth to give exemptions.

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/i...nned-iv-manny-pacquiao-fight-according-report

The content of the IV was improper since it was many times what is allowed. The amount of the substance is banned except for those legitimately received in the course of hospital admissions, surgical procedures, or clinical investigation. This is because large amounts like used here can be used to cover peds.



"The TUE for Mayweather's IV -- and the IV was administered at Floyd's house, not in a medical facility, and wasn't brought to our attention at the time -- was totally unacceptable," Bennett (of Nevada commission) is quoted as saying in the report. "I've made it clear to [USADA CEO] Travis Tygart that this should not happen again. We have the sole authority to grant any and all TUEs in the state of Nevada. USADA is a drug-testing agency. USADA should not be granting waivers and exemptions. Not in this state. We are less than pleased that USADA acted the way it did.

 

As soon as you can show me where in the article or any other source that show it was illegal, then I'll say my bad, until then, the only thing I've seen stated the substance was not banned.