Illegal is banned by law. Phohibited is against procedure. This started from you saying a WADA banned substance, when in fact it had nothing to do with the substance. It could have been water, the fact it was 500ml and not 50ml was the issue, the real issue was that the TUE was submitted 5/19 if it was submitted 5/1 all of this is irrelevant. That's the difference
Another intriguing thought if notified 1st would the NVSC even have done anything since using IVs aren't banned by them?
No it was the amount of the substance that is prohibited. Mainly because it can be used to hide peds. They are not talking about water here. And even it was water, it still banned. But it wasn't water. According to the Nevada commission, usada had no business issuing a tue in any case as nevada comm has sole auth.
" substances contained in the IV were not banned by WADA, whose standards USADA says it follows, the fact that they were given intravenously was not allowed." Copied directly from the article. Hope that makes it easier for you. Now you can stop throwing your irrelevant dictionary definitions at me.
I've now read on 5 or 6 different websites/sources completely different explanation of the 'rules' and what mayweather is allowed to do or not allowed to do. its obvious trolling as no one knows the actual rules. Until a proper and correct statement is made, its all bull. and until mayweather has a proper interview about it. no one will know. until then He's as innocent as pac has been all his career :hi: tong
According to Bennett of the nevada commission: "The TUE for Mayweather's IV -- and the IV was administered at Floyd's house, not in a medical facility, and wasn't brought to our attention at the time -- was totally unacceptable," Bennett is quoted as saying in the report. "I've made it clear to [USADA CEO] Travis Tygart that this should not happen again. We have the sole authority to grant any and all TUEs in the state of Nevada. USADA is a drug-testing agency. USADA should not be granting waivers and exemptions. Not in this state. We are less than pleased that USADA acted the way it did.
I don't know what we disagree on. If you do something that requires a permission without getting that permission FIRST - that's illegal; and within the boundaries of sports, it is prohibited. Tomato tomato. Can you be a pro fighter without a license? No. Can you participate in a pro fight and then apply for a license for that fight? No. What happens is that you'll have broken the rules and the result will be overruled - which is the case here.
Lets see where it goes from here. Surely it was known that a 500ml IV was banned by WADA and USDADA since they follow WADA (unless done in hosp as serious med procedure) before it was done TUE and everything else aside. That part is not usada's fault.
Where we disagree is you keep saying illegal. 1st WADA is not a governing body so the rules procedures mean squat, second because you started that by responding to my statement that the substance was not banned, giving me ml and everything. None of that was relevant to what I said. And none of it is illegal as no governed rules have been broken. As long as you agree USADA screwed up, we're good though, lol.
Floyd broke the rules. doing rehydration privately with alex ariza, who is consulting memo heredia, without secured permission from the authorities. not being transparent in his drug testing schedules and this is clearly not promoting "cleaning up the sport" but doing everything to preserve that "0". fighting his injured nemesis very defensively with lots of hugging and running and being told like fighting scared by his father just shows floyd is really scared of pac. it took him five years and after pac got ko'ed and past his prime before he finally agreed to fight him but still with undue advantage plus spying on his training camp and sabotaging his preferred spar mates. being undefeated is not good in the sport of boxing.
According to what's written USADA follows WADA rules. And USADA didn't follow rules about the TUE and disclosure according to the nevada commission. But USADA were not the one who broke the rule about banned IV injections.
Who's rule though, neither is a governing body for boxing in the state of Nevada, theY are doping agencies. The governing body has only at this time showed their displeasure at the USADA for filing the TUE 18 days after the fight and TUE'S are something the NSAC have the authority to file.
Wada's rule, USADA's rule etc....Bennett does refereence separately that the IV wasn't done in a med facility which is part of what is required for being allowed over the 50ml limit - in the middle of describing the tue as "totally unacceptable". He references the rule. The other thing is... didn't they all know this was banned? Forget about USADA for a second.