Should Mayweather-Pacquiao be changed to a No Contest?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Sep 10, 2015.


  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,468
    15,774
    Jul 19, 2004
    I say yes. If Tyson-Golota became a NC after Tyson smoked a little herb, this certainly seems worse than that example.

    Thoughts?

    :smoke
     
  2. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    Except floyd didnt fail a drug test. Tyson did.
     
  3. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    242,879
    236,692
    Nov 23, 2013
    Beltran-Ao and Lebedev-Jones have been so yes it should be.
     
  4. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,653
    5,991
    May 2, 2015
    Will all the threads on this be merged here?
     
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,468
    15,774
    Jul 19, 2004
    For smoking weed! :lol:

    As a proud stoner myself, I can't think of a single advantage that would provide. Whereas the situation with Floyd is something that can clearly be seen as something that would give him an unfair advantage and an edge.

    The irony here is so thick it's palpitating.

    :smoke
     
  6. thejudochop

    thejudochop Active Member Full Member

    1,402
    137
    Nov 24, 2014
    I just think there should be an asterisk next to that fight in the history books. I still think Pac would have lost. What's worse, I don't think anything would change if there were a rematch. The USADA would still cover up for FMJ.
     
  7. moparfan

    moparfan ESB's glass jawed fraud Full Member

    21,942
    2,042
    Jul 13, 2012
    Ima not voting til we get the Rummy is a piece of **** choice...!!! :bart












    :smoke
     
  8. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,468
    15,774
    Jul 19, 2004
    I tried that recently. And it's "sack" not "piece". But it loses it's luster when the key word is a banned word. And besides, I think it's a given by now that I am indeed a sack of ....


    :smoke
     
  9. Steve_Fox

    Steve_Fox Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,838
    212
    Sep 13, 2014
    yes, rematch next year.
    people will want to see this fight again (not sure about pac****s)
     
  10. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,542
    9,690
    Jan 27, 2014
    From what I gather, what Mayweather took was not banned, just the method of administration, and he even got a "TUE" for that prior to the iv. At this point in time, this whole controversy seems like a tempest in a teapot. Maybe more will come out later.
     
  11. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,468
    15,774
    Jul 19, 2004
    I'm not so sure I'd want to see it again. Between Pacquiao making a complete arrse of himself and Mayweather making a complete hypocrite of himself, and the excuses these two pansies are always making...

    They can both go screw themselves.

    :smoke
     
  12. moparfan

    moparfan ESB's glass jawed fraud Full Member

    21,942
    2,042
    Jul 13, 2012
    Well then, I vote YES...!!!

    And my sincerest apologies for labeling you as a piece of ****, when in reality, you're a sack of **** ...!!!
     
  13. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,887
    Apr 14, 2009
    If he had USADA would have covered it up no doubt
     
  14. jauseptt

    jauseptt Active Member Full Member

    695
    145
    Sep 15, 2014
    it should be changed to no contest no good
     
  15. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,468
    15,774
    Jul 19, 2004
    I ain't merging these. Look at all of them!

    :smoke