Should Mayweather-Pacquiao be changed to a No Contest?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Sep 10, 2015.

Page 8 of 22
  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    49,468
    Likes Received:
    15,777
    Not strictly adhering to the agreed upon protocol for drug testing, which is something he made quite the stink about over these past 6 years.
     
    Rumsfeld, Sep 10, 2015
    #106
  2. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2013
    Messages:
    31,293
    Likes Received:
    3,510
    Rums, you can't be serious lol...
     
    BlizzyBlizz, Sep 10, 2015
    #107
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    49,468
    Likes Received:
    15,777
    OK then. What's your take on what happened, since you seem to believe this is much ado about nothing?

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Sep 10, 2015
    #108
  4. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    35,953
    Likes Received:
    23,896
    :pop
    great rebuttal, you must be well versed in debate.
     
    bandeedo, Sep 10, 2015
    #109
  5. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2007
    Messages:
    22,761
    Likes Received:
    337
    Yes.

    Karma is a bit'h. Floyd loses again. I always knew that guy was a fraud.
     
    klion22, Sep 10, 2015
    #110
  6. Leoh

    Leoh Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2014
    Messages:
    13,749
    Likes Received:
    1,239
    "No, the result should stand as is" <- this option could as well be "I'm a Fl0m0". Block everyone who voted for that and this forum will actually be a nice place.
     
    Leoh, Sep 10, 2015
    #111
  7. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    49,468
    Likes Received:
    15,777
    Actually, based on the percentages, it would seem quite a few Floyd fans voted the NC option.
     
    Rumsfeld, Sep 10, 2015
    #112
  8. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2013
    Messages:
    243,012
    Likes Received:
    236,818
    CST80 has appropriately just cast the 80th vote for Yes on NC.:happy
     
    CST80, Sep 10, 2015
    #113
  9. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    Messages:
    9,534
    Likes Received:
    19
    No it should stand. People want to look for any little reason to discredit the win. If NSAC said he wasn't using banned substances, but, called him out on not following their specific protocol it's an administrative error...nothing more. It's kinda like when someone forgot to mention they had an injury on the required NSAC paperwork...but, wanted drugs for it before the fight. Administrative error.
     
    punisher, Sep 10, 2015
    #114
  10. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2007
    Messages:
    22,761
    Likes Received:
    337
    Dude is a fraud. He duped the entire boxing world. But I am glad the truth came out because his legacy is ruined, at least amongst the hard cores who know what actually happened.
     
    klion22, Sep 10, 2015
    #115
  11. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2007
    Messages:
    22,761
    Likes Received:
    337
    Ah shaddup u *****. Read the Hauser article.
     
    klion22, Sep 10, 2015
    #116
  12. wylan911

    wylan911 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2013
    Messages:
    2,775
    Likes Received:
    53
    They did? Then why did they put on the pre-fight survey that they had no injury to report. That was posted on TV by the way. Catch up dude.
     
    wylan911, Sep 10, 2015
    #117
  13. Leoh

    Leoh Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2014
    Messages:
    13,749
    Likes Received:
    1,239
    Actually I'd expect it to be less than 20%. It's possible that some non-Floyd fans who aren't thoroughly informed about the situation yet voted No.
     
    Leoh, Sep 10, 2015
    #118
  14. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    Messages:
    9,534
    Likes Received:
    19
    Spell out what you said...don't hide behind the asterisks.
     
    punisher, Sep 10, 2015
    #119
  15. wylan911

    wylan911 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2013
    Messages:
    2,775
    Likes Received:
    53
    I read it. There's no proof of anything there. Victor Conte brought up a suspiciosly low testerone test from 2011 and 2013, but Conte then went on to say that is not proof of using banned substance, but should raise a a red flag and CIR should have been administered. As far as this situation, Hauser reported that USADA didn't know about it unti he was seen administering it, and didn't inform NSAC until 3 days after the fight and the TUE was not applied for until 18 days after the fight. That was Hauser's take on it. The USADA released a statement saying that they did have beforehand knowledge of it, tha tthe NSAC was informed and so was Pacquiao's camp, and that the TUE was applied for before the fight, but was not approved until after.. Either way you look at it, it's who's story do you believe, and regardless of who's story you believe it is still no proof of wrong doing by Mayweather, and once again as the guy you replied to said an Administrative Error that USADA will get a slap on the wrist from Bennett from the NSAC. Why anyone believes any of that article and doesn't read up more on this is beyond me, as you can tell that the article was written with complete bias.
     
    wylan911, Sep 10, 2015
    #120
Page 8 of 22