Should Mayweather-Pacquiao be changed to a No Contest?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Sep 10, 2015.


  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,468
    15,777
    Jul 19, 2004
    Not strictly adhering to the agreed upon protocol for drug testing, which is something he made quite the stink about over these past 6 years.
     
  2. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Rums, you can't be serious lol...
     
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,468
    15,777
    Jul 19, 2004
    OK then. What's your take on what happened, since you seem to believe this is much ado about nothing?

    :smoke
     
  4. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,953
    23,896
    Feb 19, 2007
    :pop
    great rebuttal, you must be well versed in debate.
     
  5. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,761
    337
    Aug 4, 2007
    Yes.

    Karma is a bit'h. Floyd loses again. I always knew that guy was a fraud.
     
  6. Leoh

    Leoh Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,749
    1,239
    Dec 19, 2014
    "No, the result should stand as is" <- this option could as well be "I'm a Fl0m0". Block everyone who voted for that and this forum will actually be a nice place.
     
  7. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,468
    15,777
    Jul 19, 2004
    Actually, based on the percentages, it would seem quite a few Floyd fans voted the NC option.
     
  8. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    243,109
    237,034
    Nov 23, 2013
    CST80 has appropriately just cast the 80th vote for Yes on NC.:happy
     
  9. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    No it should stand. People want to look for any little reason to discredit the win. If NSAC said he wasn't using banned substances, but, called him out on not following their specific protocol it's an administrative error...nothing more. It's kinda like when someone forgot to mention they had an injury on the required NSAC paperwork...but, wanted drugs for it before the fight. Administrative error.
     
  10. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,761
    337
    Aug 4, 2007
    Dude is a fraud. He duped the entire boxing world. But I am glad the truth came out because his legacy is ruined, at least amongst the hard cores who know what actually happened.
     
  11. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,761
    337
    Aug 4, 2007
    Ah shaddup u *****. Read the Hauser article.
     
  12. wylan911

    wylan911 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,775
    53
    Sep 27, 2013
    They did? Then why did they put on the pre-fight survey that they had no injury to report. That was posted on TV by the way. Catch up dude.
     
  13. Leoh

    Leoh Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,749
    1,239
    Dec 19, 2014
    Actually I'd expect it to be less than 20%. It's possible that some non-Floyd fans who aren't thoroughly informed about the situation yet voted No.
     
  14. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    Spell out what you said...don't hide behind the asterisks.
     
  15. wylan911

    wylan911 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,775
    53
    Sep 27, 2013
    I read it. There's no proof of anything there. Victor Conte brought up a suspiciosly low testerone test from 2011 and 2013, but Conte then went on to say that is not proof of using banned substance, but should raise a a red flag and CIR should have been administered. As far as this situation, Hauser reported that USADA didn't know about it unti he was seen administering it, and didn't inform NSAC until 3 days after the fight and the TUE was not applied for until 18 days after the fight. That was Hauser's take on it. The USADA released a statement saying that they did have beforehand knowledge of it, tha tthe NSAC was informed and so was Pacquiao's camp, and that the TUE was applied for before the fight, but was not approved until after.. Either way you look at it, it's who's story do you believe, and regardless of who's story you believe it is still no proof of wrong doing by Mayweather, and once again as the guy you replied to said an Administrative Error that USADA will get a slap on the wrist from Bennett from the NSAC. Why anyone believes any of that article and doesn't read up more on this is beyond me, as you can tell that the article was written with complete bias.