here is the actual report with evidence against floyd

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bw51, Sep 11, 2015.


  1. kragz

    kragz 49*-0 Full Member

    3,910
    2
    Dec 6, 2010
    What is it with Joyboys and their "dindu nuffin" attitude? And their total incapacity to understand what evidence actually means? Evidence towards a theory is STILL evidence you **** head.

    The theory is that Floyd is masking some form of PED use. Likely blood doping (remember his vampire facials?) or Uncle Don's TRT clinic.

    What IS fact is that Floyd was injecting 750ml fluid into his arm, undisclosed, in his house, no TUE, and claimed to be dehydrated when he walks around at like 150. Those are the facts.
     
  2. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    because they hate mayweather and love manny
     
  3. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    if I find a gun in a mans house, that is evidence that he might be a killer.

    or evidence that he hunts

    or that he likes to go to the range.

    see where im getting at?

    not all evidence is strong evidence, and like most weak evidence you can manipulate it however you want :bbb
     
  4. z0r

    z0r New Member Full Member

    60
    0
    Sep 10, 2015
    If I'm 12, you need to worry more about your comprehension of the English language than I thought. Getting schooled by a 12 year old, to the point where you have to rely on insults and cursing, is really quite sad.

    You have also yet to explain how Floyd disclosing his actions after he was caught is not evidence of wrong doing. Not to mention the sheer volume of fluid he was injecting being far more than regulations allow.

    Beleife. Lol.
     
  5. kragz

    kragz 49*-0 Full Member

    3,910
    2
    Dec 6, 2010
    Re-read my post.

    The facts are clear as day and Floyd broke the rules. For what reason we don't know. Though there has been no convincing excuse to why the IV was used. Which is why people rightly suspect him of masking.
     
  6. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    so youre 12? got it.

    :good
     
  7. z0r

    z0r New Member Full Member

    60
    0
    Sep 10, 2015
    Is there something wrong with being 12?

    Your ***ual preferences aside, of course.
     
  8. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    then why did USADA grant his exemptions and specifically state that he did not use any substance outside of protocol.

    they also clearly state he filed his TUE before he took the IV.

    THE ONLY problem is the manner in which the IV was administered:deal
     
  9. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    :lol:

    Who said there was?
     
  10. z0r

    z0r New Member Full Member

    60
    0
    Sep 10, 2015
    No one. I was asking, since you seemed so obsessed by the fact.

    That's what a question mark indicates my friend. A question :).
     
  11. Lady Girl

    Lady Girl Kneel Before Zod! Full Member

    31,836
    2,059
    Nov 2, 2013
    usada aint allowed to grant exemptions, only nsac. these guys make up the rules as they go along
     
  12. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Loyal Member Full Member

    30,026
    6,988
    May 18, 2006
    It's not evidence you have to place that gun to the crime scene.

    Watch CSI and Homicide.

    Where's your evidence Pac was drugging? by believing Mayweather

    A-side mef and ariza shakes BS?

    Now we're spitting the same shyt at ya son.

    What happened back then is happening your hero joy boy.

    Deal with it.
     
  13. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    Right, so itsa fact :deal.

    Thanks for proving me right.
     
  14. itsa

    itsa Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,747
    48
    May 22, 2015
    I never said pac was drugging, just that he dodged a blood test.

    I never claimed him a cheater once
     
  15. z0r

    z0r New Member Full Member

    60
    0
    Sep 10, 2015
    Congratulations. You've managed to be totally wrong in your argument and still confirm that Floyd cheated.

    The only problem is the manner in which the IV was administered? So he went against regulations then? He cheated?