Should Mayweather-Pacquiao be changed to a No Contest?

Awesome, so then you did know Mayweather was prohibited in what he did.

Sorry if you knew this. So many people on the forum confuse on what protocols them two were under, so my fault to jump to a conclusion.

 

Suddenly Nonito guy abandons the thread

They have a hard time admitting that Mayweather did something not allowed

 

He passed the tests bottom line

 

I'm here, huckleberry.

 

So you admit that Mayweather did something that wasn't allowed correct?

It's a simple Yes or No answer

 

Protocol can always be corrected. As long as there wasn't any illegal substances used, I'm good. We live in a world where Pac and Floyd will be accused of anything from committing libel to cheating. I have never on any forum said Pac was guilty of anything. But I have called him suspect, and if Floyd is called suspect...I can live with that.

 

They both failed there tests. Both

 

If USADA walks in and sees this in Pac's home, tests what's in the IV, tests Pac and everything is negative including blood and urine, I'm good. The fanatics will just war like they are doing now.

 

Hey, whatever it takes to pass, right?! Ends > Means.

 

This is completely no different from Aaron Pryor and Panama Lewis. You'd really have to be licking Floyd ' s nuts to say there is nothing shady about this.

 

Like DJ Yella always says; "I don't know about any of that. I wasn't there. So how could I know?"

I'll wait until we stop getting contradictory reports before I even make an opinion on that. I haven't personally seen the contracts between May/Pac/NSAC/USADA/WADA, so I can't say. It's going to depend on the language in those contracts, I would assume.

The reports say that he did something that was allowed by NSAC and USADA but not allowed by WADA. We will wait and see what becomes of it. No point in drawing conclusions quickly and then being made to regret them or realize they were incorrect or formed off incorrect info (see: Tony Thompson's recent case).

I imagine we will all get a definitive answer in federal court as this issue will surely make it's way up there if the allegations are correct.

 

Peep chimp bigot trying to inject himself into the convo. Wanna be failed boxer. Can't even be yourself. Writing different in a lame attempt to hide your shameful life.

 

We have a clown here from Sceneboxing trying to sludge this forum with his **** opinion. Go back to Sceneboxing you degenerate.

 

:rofl
youre so full of sh-t you got mushrooms growing on you.

 

The NSAC is saying that they were made aware of Floyd getting an IV for fluids before he actually did it. So they did actually allow him beforehand as what he did is indeed standard protocol for the NSAC. Just not standard protocol for WADA. So you've gotten them mixed up.

It's just not up to the NSAC to relay that information to WADA or to know what specifics WADA allows and doesn't allow. They have their own. Which is why NSAC has always been very on-the-outside when it comes to drug testing and particularly joint-testing with the organizations.

Like for Pacquiao vs. Bradley II they used WADA sample collectors but only the same old NSAC tests and rules as always. Therefore if Bradley did the same thing for that fight that Mayweather reportedly did, he wouldn't have been violating protocol as WADA was not bound into the contract. WADA-samplers-with-NSAC-testing-and-rules were. So it all depends on the language of the contract, I imagine... If WADA rules do not supersede the NSAC and their rules, then I'm not sure what specifically the complaints would be other than at the confusing nature of contracts and multiple testing organizations (which, if people really cared, they would have already known about before two days ago).

Either way, it's going to federal court and we will all get our answers.