24 pages of facts, proving that Hauser is a god damn liar. http://www.usada.org/wp-content/upl...ection-to-SB-Nation-Article-by-Tom-Hauser.pdf Long read get ur popcorn ready.
Once again, it's proven that Hausen is nothing but a lying pos trying to defame Mr.Mayweather. I've always known that
And you really believe Hauser a known mayweather hater. He had no facts, lies lies lies :rofl The haters ate it up. Silly rabbits.
Haha. Look how they forget to mention what the exact WADA rules are and how they explain their acting to what's in the text. More and more I'm beginning to believe that USADA is indeed corrupt, because instead of just admitting that they screwed up in this case and won't make that mistake next time, they're acting like Hauser is making rules up. The rules are out there for everyone to see, and in no way USADA followed the WADA rules when it comes to handing a waiver for administring an IV.
Point after point Hauser was exposed as a liar even when granted with facts he still ran with incorrect info willingly.
"USADA was advised that Mr. Mayweather would be applying for a TUE several days after the IV was administered. The completed TUE application was received by USADA on May 19, 2015, and approved on May 21, 2015. Mr. Mayweather, Mr. Pacquiao and the NSAC were all provided notice of Mr. Mayweathers TUE approval on May 21, 2015." so this is their response? somehow, some people seem to think this is the best way to catch cheaters, or that this proves floyd didn't cheat. :-(
Has Floyd Mayweather at any point used IV drips ? if the answer is yes then this article or Hauser's article are irrelevant. Using a drip is illegal because it can mask positive test results, end of. Arguing over what was in what and when who how is totally irrelevant.
A urine test was taken before IV was administered then after IV was administered. All Mayweather and Pac samples were CIR tested, the very thing VADA bang on about. These are all facts. So what exactly could he be masking when he tested before IV was administered in front of USADA accrediting officials :deal
This still doesn't explain the difference of opinion in regards to what happened between USADA and NSAC and NSAC initially understanding of what happened came from USADA original report. They pick apart the article and yes they do point out some inaccuracies but they don't disprove the most important and damning aspects of Hauser's article in fact in some parts it confirms aspects of the article are correct such as NSAC were unaware of the IV or the TUE until after the fact. If Hauser's article is incorrect why are they not taking legal proceedings instead of running a PR exercise. If Hauser has lied then it wouldn't take much to force a retraction if USADA took him to court for defamation and libel.
It's because they would have to prove it's fake, and in return prove that their story is factual. They can't do that obviously. W t f is wrong with USADA? They can't prove their story?
