USADA just proved Hauser is a liar.

Bingo!

 

Youre not answering the question. How can a letter of exemption make 750ml of saline and vitamins solution any less capable of flushing out traces of peds and blood doping.
You dumbass ***** lol..

 

statement: "USADA was created in 1999"
answer: "USADA began operations on October 1, 2000."

statement: "Because of this role, USADA receives approximately $10 million"
answer: "This is inaccurate. In 2014 USADA received $8.75M"

USADA is simply a joke. Like a knock knock who's there? USADA. USADA who? kind of joke.

 

What were the reasons for his application?????

 

When you're dealing with facts these type of inconsistencies add up. You can't write a story like this unless you have 100% correct information that's journalism 101.:deal It also shows that Hauser is willing to bend and stretch things to suit his agenda which further damages his credibility report facts or **** off.

 

uhhh what? if you can't get the SIMPLE facts right, facts you can get simply by googling, why should readers trust your other conjectures about "insider information"?

 

Except IVIayweather, though proven not to have taken anything in the prohibited in the WADA list, by using 750ml saline and vitamin solution did go OVER the 50ml Limit outlined by WADA.. Which is illegal as it can mask use of prohibited substances and methods.

 

troll troll troll your boat

 

lol. flo mos. In any other sport like Cycling or the Olympics, use of an IV would equal a ban.

 

Then why wasn't LeBron banned? Re****. He used IV bags too. For dehydration. Same with Floyd.

 

What does the NBA have to do with WADA Code jack ass? Cycling and the Olympics adhere to 365 days a year WADA Code. :roll:

 

this has been covered 100x already on the forum

nsac said that usada doesn't have jurisdiction to grant TUE.
now that nsac says they dont see a reason to investigate it under the believe that fraud didnt cheated doesn't mean that usada is alloowed to grant TUE. nor does, USADA language that IV are not against NSAC rules give USADa authorization to issue TUE. lets not mistake negligence for legitimacy

wada states clear protocol for granting TUE and usada did not follow that protocol

it states in the rulebook that there mb documented medical reason under hospital supervision. a retroactive TUE can only be issued in most extreme medical circumstances. mild dehydration, as interpreted by consensus and documented medical practice, does not warrant a TUe let alone a retroactive one in which only the nsac can issue in the first place

 

He asked for permission before administering, do your homework. He told USADA he was going to do it. Thanks try again. Nothing was illegal about it. Even NSAC claimed no foul play with PEDS was there. Keep reaching :nod

 

Not sure you comprehend. Any IV use is considered doping. It's ironic cuz you ho mos were all over Pac w/o a shred of proof and here we have IV Gate and all you can do is to hide from the truth. Pathetic. Two faced.