USADA just proved Hauser is a liar.

Welcome to 1998. :roll:


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/12/s...-armstrong-beat-cyclings-drug-tests.html?_r=0

 

Oh oh.

 

floyd is publicly recorded with ellerbe saying he was dehydraated


so he knew in april when the TUE clause was added in the contract that he was gonna be dehydrated in may?

since you appear smarter than other fl0m0s in attemting to read the rule, what is the best way to treat de hydration?

secondly, i question that IV are allowed by NSAC...maybe there is ntg perse in their rulebook but that doesnt make it "legal"

most commission woud refer to wada when there is no precedence

let me know what further research you can find on both accounts

 

Usada, addressed all points. Hauser, was not there and does not have inside information. Try again pac****s.

 

He can read the future? Or was it all planned out?

 

But if they took samples prior to the IV, and samples afterwards - masking is clearly not possible.

And for those who say "what if he was using IVs long before that to mask", well, then why bother with the IV prior to the fight if you're going to be tested beforehand and your levels are okay enough to mask anyway?

The argument makes no sense.

Short of wearing a tin-foil hat and believing NSAC and USADA are willing to jeopardise their organisations to help Mayweather dope, I don't see where this goes.

 

maybe both....but if he is guilty it tells me IVs were apart of his nutritional meal plan way b4 may 1st

 

Before and after when? Where's the test results proving that statement? How long of a duration? 5 mins before and after? Can you repeat anymore of their vagueness?

And as you see, IV use = masking doping. It's old as **** and was banned decades ago. It's news to you guys cuz boxing is ****ing archaic. In cycling, it means DOPER obviously.

 

I think that's a fair line of questioning. Honestly no idea if it's normal or not - provided it was overseen by a medical practitioner, I see no issue with venue personally, but I'd be curious to know how frequently the circumstances arise too.

I'd also like to know the exact medical condition which saw it granted, but I appreciate these things are confidential for a reason - same way my medical records are confidential. Equally, I'd have liked to see the medical records on Pac's shoulder, but that's just the way these things are.

 

usada in their rebuttal seems to have way too much knowledge about contractual negotiations

as a testing agency, their answer sb

"i dont know, we just test and report"

they are too deeply involved

 

it certainly seems like a rare occurrence

 

And in all this, how does a world class athlete who never had problems making weight, suddenly dehydrates himself soooo bad after weigh-ins when during the weigh-in he showed NO SIGNS of DEHYDRATION?