USADA just proved Hauser is a liar.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bladegunner, Sep 17, 2015.


  1. bw51

    bw51 Active Member Full Member

    1,151
    90
    Dec 12, 2012
    link?
     
  2. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,600
    24,770
    Feb 19, 2007
    its on the la times website. google la times haymon lawsuit.
    he also apparently scolded haymons attorneys for wasting the courts time with bull**** arguments. doesnt sound like the feds are letting this one slip by.
     
  3. GuestAppearance

    GuestAppearance Member Full Member

    499
    0
    Dec 26, 2009
    People are arguing for 10 pages, lost in the fighting is that Hauser never ever proved that Mayweather was actually on steroids. People are wasting their time bickering over an IV. Either you are or you aint on roids, there is nothing in between. If he took an illegal dosage of saline and vitamins MINUS steroids then quite frankly, I don't give a ****. Until you show me he actually did roids then I would care. But as of right now, Hauser and USDA are both wasting my time.
     
  4. boxon123

    boxon123 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,040
    72
    Nov 28, 2004
    Really ? Like most substances and methods on the WADA Prohibited List,
    the
    use of IVs in this manner is prohibited without a TUE. When an athlete
    has an approved TUE
    , as in the case of Mr. Mayweather,
    who received
    a retroactive TUE for his use of an IV containing saline and vitamins,
    it
    is not a violation of the
    WADA
    rules to
    use the substance or method.
    Retroactive TUEs are a standard part of the
    WADA International
    Standard for
    The****utic Use Exemption
    s
    (ISTUE)
    .What a load of ****
    RETROACTIVE
    THE****UTIC USE EXEMPTIONS
    (TUEs)
    Applications for
    retroactive TUEs
    are limited to
    medical emergencies and
    ‘exceptional circumstances’.
    Exceptional
    circumstances
    are those
    in which “there
    was insufficient time or opportunity for an applicant to submi
    t, or a TUE
    C
    ommittee
    to consider, an application prior to
    Doping Control
    .
     
  5. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    Hmmm...I bet you weren't singing Teddy Atlas' praises when he talked about a certain letter out there regarding Mr. Pacquiao. Teddy, I don't think, ever retracted his statement. But, it was clear someone in high places told him to shut up.

    In any case, Hauser's statements require certifiable evidence of an intent to cheat in order for them to qualify as anything more than a conspiracy theory.
     
  6. boyschoir

    boyschoir Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,662
    0
    Nov 6, 2011
    PAC is a PED cheat coz his head got bigger :rofl

    Floyd is clean....so clean that he needed an IV administered at home :rofl
     
  7. ryan_c

    ryan_c Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,507
    30
    Oct 6, 2007
    Floyd has not yet been granted a TUE when he was injected with 750 ml IV. Even if he was grandted a TUE, as NSAC told, USADA is not authorize to do that.

    Floyd clearly violated WADA.
     
  8. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,913
    2,173
    Feb 8, 2008
    :good Exactly why Floyd chose them to " clean up the sport"
     
  9. BoxedOut

    BoxedOut Member Full Member

    134
    0
    Jun 8, 2014
    floyd did a procedure without prior permit from sanctioning bodies and only applied for permit weeks after, which is in and of itself deemed illegal based on existing regulations. what's there difficult to comprehend, flofans?
     
  10. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,913
    2,173
    Feb 8, 2008
    :good
     
  11. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    What a load of ****. "Partial" urine samples and a retroactive TUE? This **** is usually for emergencies, I wouldn't doubt he paid the committee to grant his exemption. Holy **** man I can't believe you guys lap this **** up

    Like seriously some of this **** is unnecessarily nitpicky. Hauser states they get approximately 10M, their response: CORRECTION we received an 8.75M grant.

    And some of these aren't even outright corrections. Like their stance on year-round testing, they practically agree.

    Some points they strike up like this:

    Also doesn't mean anything because just because one side stipulates it doesn't mean the other side can't take advantage of it. Paragraph 30 of the contract alludes to conflicts between the fight contract and testing protocol.
     
  12. sparta

    sparta Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,663
    846
    Feb 4, 2008
    thank god, read this conspiricy theorists who buy facts from journalists trying to sell a story. Great piece my friend
     
  13. Doc Everlast

    Doc Everlast Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,371
    10
    Aug 23, 2013
    750 milliliters? Damn I wonder how long he was hooked up to the IV for and all those fluids to enter his body?
     
  14. boxon123

    boxon123 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,040
    72
    Nov 28, 2004
    And that was exactly my point ! Exemptions 19 days later are very suspicious in anyone's world .
    USADA are saying he is not in violation because he had a exemption after the fact . They are full of ****.
     
  15. Doc Everlast

    Doc Everlast Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,371
    10
    Aug 23, 2013
    When they have to go into long explanations like that it usually means they are embarrassed and overdoing the PR. If Hauser is such a liar why not just file a defamation /assassination or WETF you want to call it lawsuit against him and the people who publish his articles?