its on the la times website. google la times haymon lawsuit. he also apparently scolded haymons attorneys for wasting the courts time with bull**** arguments. doesnt sound like the feds are letting this one slip by.
People are arguing for 10 pages, lost in the fighting is that Hauser never ever proved that Mayweather was actually on steroids. People are wasting their time bickering over an IV. Either you are or you aint on roids, there is nothing in between. If he took an illegal dosage of saline and vitamins MINUS steroids then quite frankly, I don't give a ****. Until you show me he actually did roids then I would care. But as of right now, Hauser and USDA are both wasting my time.
Really ? Like most substances and methods on the WADA Prohibited List, the use of IVs in this manner is prohibited without a TUE. When an athlete has an approved TUE , as in the case of Mr. Mayweather, who received a retroactive TUE for his use of an IV containing saline and vitamins, it is not a violation of the WADA rules to use the substance or method. Retroactive TUEs are a standard part of the WADA International Standard for The****utic Use Exemption s (ISTUE) .What a load of **** RETROACTIVE THE****UTIC USE EXEMPTIONS (TUEs) Applications for retroactive TUEs are limited to medical emergencies and ‘exceptional circumstances’. Exceptional circumstances are those in which “there was insufficient time or opportunity for an applicant to submi t, or a TUE C ommittee to consider, an application prior to Doping Control .
Hmmm...I bet you weren't singing Teddy Atlas' praises when he talked about a certain letter out there regarding Mr. Pacquiao. Teddy, I don't think, ever retracted his statement. But, it was clear someone in high places told him to shut up. In any case, Hauser's statements require certifiable evidence of an intent to cheat in order for them to qualify as anything more than a conspiracy theory.
PAC is a PED cheat coz his head got bigger :rofl Floyd is clean....so clean that he needed an IV administered at home :rofl
Floyd has not yet been granted a TUE when he was injected with 750 ml IV. Even if he was grandted a TUE, as NSAC told, USADA is not authorize to do that. Floyd clearly violated WADA.
floyd did a procedure without prior permit from sanctioning bodies and only applied for permit weeks after, which is in and of itself deemed illegal based on existing regulations. what's there difficult to comprehend, flofans?
What a load of ****. "Partial" urine samples and a retroactive TUE? This **** is usually for emergencies, I wouldn't doubt he paid the committee to grant his exemption. Holy **** man I can't believe you guys lap this **** up Like seriously some of this **** is unnecessarily nitpicky. Hauser states they get approximately 10M, their response: CORRECTION we received an 8.75M grant. And some of these aren't even outright corrections. Like their stance on year-round testing, they practically agree. Some points they strike up like this: Also doesn't mean anything because just because one side stipulates it doesn't mean the other side can't take advantage of it. Paragraph 30 of the contract alludes to conflicts between the fight contract and testing protocol.
thank god, read this conspiricy theorists who buy facts from journalists trying to sell a story. Great piece my friend
750 milliliters? Damn I wonder how long he was hooked up to the IV for and all those fluids to enter his body?
And that was exactly my point ! Exemptions 19 days later are very suspicious in anyone's world . USADA are saying he is not in violation because he had a exemption after the fact . They are full of ****.
When they have to go into long explanations like that it usually means they are embarrassed and overdoing the PR. If Hauser is such a liar why not just file a defamation /assassination or WETF you want to call it lawsuit against him and the people who publish his articles?