Ariza defends Floyd

[yt]eXfp859pcM0[/yt]

 

I'm fairly certain Floyd is dirty...

Paranoid about Pacquiao being dirty
Boasts about how he is tested (When USADA is **** anyway)
Caught with an IV bag.

Marquez & Pac also probably have been on some sht.

 

three things

1.) he took greater than 50 ml perr 6 hours
this is a violation as he took 750

2.) greater than 50 requires a TUE
as far as we know unless proven otherwise, the NSAC is the issuing body.
TUE need to be approved beforehand

3,) retroactive TUE ONLY be issued in extreme circumstances.
the conditions above do not cover RETROactive TUEs


to find out more about retroactive TUE, refer to the WADA ISTUE guidlines

i will post it later

either way, rules broken on all 3 accounts

 

Forgetting one thing..USADA arent suppose to do TUEs hence why there was a conflict with NSAC.
And still TUEs still dont make the whole deal any less shady.. Such an amount enough to hide traces of peds and blood doping... Did it at home.. And then filed for a retroactive tue.. Is enough to make him guilty.. And now their saying floyd was severely dehydrated around the time of the weigh in .. Cmon man cmon,

 

Technically, NSAC should have denied the TUE because he did not apply for it in time, just like... drumroll Pac's request. Am I right?

 

Exactly. The WADA Anti Doping Code has been clearly violated by Mayweather. What he did is no different than having some anabolic steroids injected into himself in public right after the weigh-in as far as violations and sanctions go. I believe everyone understands what happened, they argue for the sake of argument hoping Floyd will get a "pass" for what he did like he always had in his career.

"It was so close"

 

Well according to the *****s floyd was severely dehydrated during / after the weigh in, So that qualifies..i think.. Just wondering if anyone has pictures of floyd during the weigh in showing just how severly dehydrated he was??

 

in the court of public opinion where there are tons of common sense and wisdom, there are just too many circumstantial evidence painting floyd as a cheat he has to come out and explain himself clearly otherwise his legacy is tainted. his t/e ratio and nsac tue protocol violations cannot just be ignored any more even though he has questionable acts in the past like his retiring and unretiring, fighting once or twice a year only, fighters in his stable caught doping, hiring ariza when he has no problems with his conditioning and memo heredia being consulted by his camp.

 

Correct..
But nsac now also sayin floyd did no wrong :nut

 

according to the ISTUE....it is 21 days but on the actual application who have to check and confirm that there was a medical emegency or exceptional circusmtance. so they got it in time

but it also states that no known alternative methods of treatment can be available if it is not a medical emergency

otherwise, retroactive TUEs are forbidden


my interpretation of the rulebook can be wrong but it is written in plain english as far as i am concerned


how the NSAC approved it the day after is amazing..i wonder if there was a doctor who signedd off

 

Let me get one thing straight.. how does Ariza go from a dirty PED pusher S&C coach while under Pacquiao to someone who is suddenly a great S&C coach who uses no PEDs while under Mayweather according to the floyd****s?

 

well they have to bc they approved it on may19th no one was looking at it....now they loook bad so they are forced to retract the initial statement that UsADa farked up

 

Dehydration is not a medical emergency.


This is a farcical precedent. If they allow boxers to claim dehydration then suck down 750ml, that equates to promoting doping. Free IV masking for all then?

 

I cannot believe NSAC is willing to go down with the ship. They're willing to put their reputation on the line to defend this Fraud. It's not like there's still a chance Floyd might be innocent, this S8ht has guilty written all over it. I mean they're literally saying it's ok for Froid to do IV 14 times the legal limit at home with Dr Seuss present. This just show they are corrupted at the highest standard them self.

 

including an indemnified contract clause stating that if either party were caught breaking doping rules, there would be no legal recourse. why wud may agree to this?

including the inclusion of TUEs in april in the contract, only applying on May 19th