Ariza defends Floyd

Yes. and Pac wanted VADA for this fight and floyd refused now we see why....

 

:good

 

Funny since several of floyd's boxers have tested positive yet he was ok with them being dirty by his own admission in a video such an advocate right... :hey

 

Is that like he was a advocate for violence against women before the the Corrales fight?

 

Bob Bennett has issued a new statement: "I have no concern Mr. Clinton had sexual relations with Ms. Lewinski." saying "Mr. President's semen stain on Ms. Lewinski's dress is an unfortunate coincidence and it could "happen to anyone". No further investigation is necessary and the case is closed".

 

Its funnny because theyre flip flopping. Its obvious.. But you wont see that because you believe floyd to be pure and virginal..They're all up to their ears in it

 

Ariza with Pac = Pac is juiced to the gills with Ariza smoothies :rofl


Ariza with Floyd = Floyd is clean...so clean even if he was being IV'ed at home :rofl

"it's the hypocrisy of Floyd's fans that's funny" - Doug Fischer (RING TV):deal

 

Nobody minded when he was on Pacquiao's payroll.

 

This content is protected

“He cannot have it done at his house and [USADA] can’t authorize it.... I have specifically articulated and memorialized to USADA that [NSAC] is the sole authority that can authorize a the****utic-use exemption for a fighter in the state of Nevada,” Bennett said. “USADA never told us prior to the IV that they had their own TUE, and they never kept us informed about it being administered.

“If they think they can do what they want, where and whenever they want in the state of Nevada, they are grossly mistaken.”

Bennett and Aguilar said despite USADA’s involvement in 45 boxing cards and their supervision of the Ultimate Fighting Championship’s anti-doping system, the agency has botched communication on three occasions.

The most recent, Bennett said, came last week when UFC heavyweight Frank Mir had a TUE approved by USADA for the stimulant Adderall.

“They had no business authorizing that TUE, and we said it’s unacceptable, that he had to fill out our application and go through our doctor,” Bennett said. “[Mir] was told he had to stop taking the stimulant immediately.”

Bennett said when he explained the situation to Mir at his weigh-in last week the fighter expressed confusion about how the process works.


“They’re confusing the fighters. I have spoken to Travis several times. The bottom line is that we need to ensure that the fighters are educated about the process. By approving TUEs in the state of Nevada, they are going to confuse the fighters and it is quite evident Mr. Mir was confused,” Bennett said.

“After three incidents here, it’s hard to call this an anomaly,” Bennett said. “They need to understand they need to honor the rules of Nevada, or their work will not be recognized in Nevada.”

http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-ps-sn-usada-floyd-mayweather-iv-20150910-story.html

Jeff Novitzky, UFC's vice president of Athlete Performance and Health, granted Mir a TUE for Adderall -- essentially a drug that helps one focus -- on behalf of USADA, but it was denied in the final hour by Bennett and NSAC because "there was not enough time."

A fighter must "fill out our paperwork and provide us with documentation from their doctors," Bennett said.

http://www.mmamania.com/2015/9/12/9314773/ufc-vice-president-backs-usada-floyd-mayweather-frank-mir

This content is protected

Bennet, clearing mayweather
https://youtu.be/DTeIiJoufqs

" Bennett said he has no concerns Mayweather was working to mask drug use, saying the boxer " has always been an advocate of drug testing and has set a fine example for all fighters".





accordiing to how NSAC handled the UFC case, if they operated with the same standard, mayweather's retroactive TUE should have been denied, even if 19 days later.

 

PART TWO: STANDARDS AND PROCESS FOR GRANTING
TUES
4.0 Obtaining a TUE
4.1 An Athlete may be granted a TUE if (and only if) he/she can show that each of the following conditions is met:

a. The Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method in question is needed to treat an acute or chronic

This content is protected

condition, such that the Athlete would experience a significant impairment to health if the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method were to be withheld.

b. The The****utic Use of the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method is highly unlikely to produce any additional enhancement of performance beyond what might be anticipated by a return to the Athlete’s normal state of health following the treatment of the acute or chronic medical condition.

This content is protected

d. The necessity for the Use of the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited
Method is not a consequence, wholly or in part, of the prior Use (without a TUE) of a substance or method which was prohibited at the time of such Use.

[Comment to 4.1: The WADA documents titled “Medical Information to Support the Decisions of TUECs”, posted on WADA’s website, should be used to assist in the application of these criteria in relation to particular medical conditions.]

4.2 Unless one of the exceptions set out in Article 4.3 applies, an Athlete who needs to Use a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method

This content is protected

4.3 An Athlete may only be granted

This content is protected

for his/her The****utic Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (i.e., a retroactive TUE) if:

This content is protected

c. The applicable rules required the Athlete (see comment to Article 5.1) or permitted the Athlete (see Code Article 4.4.5) to apply for a retroactive TUE



5.2 Each National Anti-Doping Organization, International Federation and Major Event Organization must establish a TUEC to consider whether applications for grant or recognition of TUEs meet the conditions set out in Article 4.1.
[Comment to 5.2: While a Major Event Organization may choose to recognize pre-existing TUEs automatically, there must be a mechanism for Athletes participating in the Event to obtain a new TUE if the need arises. It is up to each Major Event Organization whether it sets up its own TUEC for this purpose, or rather whether it outsources the task by agreement to a third party (such as Sport
Accord). The aim in each case should be to ensure that Athletes competing in such Events have the ability to obtain TUEs quickly and efficiently before they compete.

This content is protected

b. In order to ensure a level of independence of decisions, at least a
majority of the members of a TUEC should have no political
responsibility in the Anti-Doping Organization that appoints them. All
members of the TUEC must sign a conflict of interest and confidentiality declaration. (A template declaration is available on WADA’s website

 

:good:happy

so I find it hard that mayweather even got approved a normal TUE let alone a retroactive one since he showed no sign of a chronic or acute medical condition at a time before having the IV administered..

chronic dehydration??.. yeah.. right....

maybe the mods should sticky the WADA rules/guides you posted to serve as a reminder.

 

Having Ariza defend you is like the final nail in the coffin.

 

Are you kidding me

 

well officially he did get the TUE approved by NSAC 19 days later, that is why they are trying to brush it under the carpet

 

Too much at stake. the 400m plus that was generated. What happens if it is proven that Floyd was doping and USADA and NSAC was complicit in sweeping it under the rug? They've already made their choice and have to ride it out. Unfortunately for us, Boxing is too small for the mainstream to get excited over.