New ESPN P4P rankings. . .

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by abuffy, Sep 23, 2015.


  1. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,905
    2,165
    Feb 8, 2008
    :good
     
  2. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,636
    16,329
    Jul 19, 2004
    So what?

    Wlad was brought up old school, fighting very frequently early in his career. It boggles my mind that this strategy is no longer employed by other young prospects, as I think it's immensely beneficial. But the stat you quote is essentially meaningless without context.
     
  3. NUCLEAR

    NUCLEAR Active Member Full Member

    823
    5
    Aug 20, 2015
    Bradley should even be higher.
     
  4. BoxerFan89

    BoxerFan89 Active Member Full Member

    1,064
    8
    Jan 17, 2015
    Only 1 American fighter.
     
  5. jesse

    jesse Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,650
    3
    Apr 14, 2013
    What's your point ? :rofl
     
  6. jesse

    jesse Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,650
    3
    Apr 14, 2013
    Uh no
     
  7. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    24
    Jul 28, 2008
    when you get knocked out, then lose again, win 3 in a row (2 against guys not in your division) and then shut out...that doesnt constitute a pound for pound ranking. PERIOD.
     
  8. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    Does beating Timothy Bradley (again) who was undefeated, prime, and coming off wins against Provo and Marquez, mean nothing?

    Was that not one of the best wins that year?

    Also, the Bradley "loss" was b4 the KO, not after. Also, two guys who fought at 140 is not so outside his weight class since Pac isn't even a natural WW himself. He's a more natural 140 pounder. Remember he was 144 pounds a week b4 the Floyd fight.
     
  9. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,515
    8,074
    Sep 2, 2011
    Bradley can be on P4P list, he's got the resume but his performances haven't been amazing except for Marquez recently not to mention a loss to Pac. 7 is too high though.

    Golovkin at #2, well this doesn't require any explanation, just stupidity.

    Wlad, way too low.

    Ward, I'd personally not have him on the list but #6 is reasonable if you will, just don't put him at #2 or something ridiculous like that when he's not done anything recently.

    Pacquiao, way too high, he's not been at all impressive recently. Was knocked out devastatingly, got badly outboxed too. Just has wins over a couple mediocre guys.
     
  10. Doc Everlast

    Doc Everlast Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,371
    10
    Aug 23, 2013
    I agree.
     
  11. Doc Everlast

    Doc Everlast Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,371
    10
    Aug 23, 2013
    Actually his body frame is more that of a lightweight.
     
  12. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,443
    1,025
    Mar 6, 2011
    Klitschko and Povetkin both beat the former unified HW champ in that time frame as well. I wasn't that impressed with their wins either.
     
  13. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    Stop talking out of your ass. Pacquiao LOST the first Bradley fight...
     
  14. Bensub

    Bensub Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,527
    1,051
    Jan 17, 2015
    Bradley at 7 he isn't even in the top 5 in his weight class.
     
  15. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    Pacquiao Bradley I was NO robbery. Get a clue about the proper way to score a fight.