Smallest fighters you would favor over Jack Johnson?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, Sep 24, 2015.


  1. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,575
    Jan 30, 2014
    Who are the smallest fighters (measured by weight class) that you would favor in a 12 or 15-round head to head matchup against Jack Johnson?
     
  2. Reason123

    Reason123 Not here for the science fiction. Full Member

    1,113
    270
    Jul 27, 2015
    I wouldn't favor anyone under 170 over a prime Johnson. Has to be at least a light heavyweight. Out of the light heavies I could see doing it are Jim Corbett, Bob Fitzsimmons, Tommy Loughran, Gene Tunney, Ezzard Charles, and RJJ. These guys I can boxing Johnson's ears off for a 12 or 15 rounder. Expect for Fitz I can see Fitz catching Johnson chin and if Ketchel can knock him down Fitz can keep him down.
     
  3. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,111
    17,651
    Apr 26, 2006
  4. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    4,436
    44
    Aug 2, 2015
    Marciano/Spinks/RJJ/Tarver/James Toney/Hagler/Patterson/..off the top of my head! Theres probably a multitude of them.ive never even followed or study.didnt this guy struggle with out of date 160 pounders?
     
  5. Reason123

    Reason123 Not here for the science fiction. Full Member

    1,113
    270
    Jul 27, 2015
    I can't favor Roy doing it at 168 too weak. Too much risk of Johnson landing hard and KOing him like Ketchel. I know Roy is a much better boxer than Ketchel but Johnson's clinching with all 200 pounds of him would wear down any 168 pounder I think. I'd favor him at 175 because he'd still be fast and strong enough to handle Johnson's clinches and not get drained. I think those seven pounds are just what he needs for me to favor him.
     
  6. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014
    Andre Ward. Hopkins. McCallum
     
  7. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    4,436
    44
    Aug 2, 2015
    What rules.past or modern..is dirty boxing allowed?This would effect some picks.With modern rules he would get comfortably out boxed by many.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,452
    45,963
    Feb 11, 2005
  9. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,489
    13,035
    Oct 12, 2013
  10. Pete47

    Pete47 Member Full Member

    256
    6
    Mar 3, 2007
    Although it may seem a little strange: Perhaps Barbados Joe Walcott in an early stage of Johnson`s career. Walcott fought against heavyweights (for example versus Joe Choynski) and - as far as I know - Johnson was his sparring partner for some time.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    Yeah ,Johnson couldn't box for sh*t.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    Yup ,Johnson never fought anyone over middleweight.
    You nailed it once again!:good
     
  13. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,530
    80,767
    Aug 21, 2012
    RJJ? Greb? Wouldn't mind seeing some great MW's in action against JJ ... if he had a series I'm guessing he'd lose at least a couple?
     
  14. Anh

    Anh Undisputed chicken dancer Full Member

    224
    5
    Oct 25, 2010
    If you teleported the likes of Roy Jones Jr or any decent sub-heavyweight fighter in the last 25 years back to 1908, Jack Johnson would be too much for them in the type of conditions the older fighters fought in.

    Johnson fighting in a modern era with modern conditions would still be dangerous, he's pretty witty in the ring, and that his cautious style will lure the smaller fighter in side where he would psyche them and overpower them.
     
  15. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,274
    2,538
    Mar 16, 2008