Do you get your rhetoric from the Ram Jam Singh college of dull wit, and stupid answers? First you have got either Klitcho idiot faster than prime Ali, with better footwork than prime Ali, and now you are claiming that one of the plums was as accurate as prime Ali. The sunshine bus should be along soon, make sure you don't miss it.:nut
Wrong again,dolt,Wlad is on par punch for punch even so genius his longer reach combined with speed and sharper punching will get there first.prime Ali was not that accurate at all,just watch the mildenberger fight he barley hits at all in the first 4 rounds,where even by mid rounds the announcers say ali finally lands the first meaningful punch of the night,and that was a guy standing right there he was punching DOWN on....:nut
Now I know for certain you've never watched that fight, which in turn means you have no idea what you're talking about. 30 seconds left in the second, Byrd is backing him up. Many other instances throught this fight, and anyone who has watched it knows this.
You have NEVER watched the Mildenberger fight which based on the above rubbish is only too obvious, moron. Vlad Klitchko has never had the connect rate in ANY 5 rounds in his whole career that Ali scored in any one round pre exile. Leetchko couldn't throw a 6 punch combination at a speed bag without missing, never mind an opponent that could actually move.nut:rofl:rofl
Smaller fighters have beaten bigger fighters throughout history. This isnt a reach to me based on their respective styles and skills. I do agree these threads get ridiculous though as there is no viable way for either side to truly prove theyre right. And while I may not agree with you I respect the way you have layed out your opinion.
you are a fool even the announcers I believe off memory in round7/8 are saying ali starting to look worried because mildenberger was landing on him,he even buckled him over with body shots twice,seems like you are the one who didn't watch the fight? The hard truth is ali when even missing shots are scored for some odd reason?:yep
Backing someone up for a instance doesn't win fights,you obviously don't like Vitali and bend facts like the others,fortunatly theres video to continually disprove you.
yeah he sure did, Olympic gold, undisputed hw champ at 26, unbeaten run, great ko ratio against top contenders and champs, beating a top atg, somethings that few have done. he outdid the klitboys with these "less than ideal gifts" for sure. He outdid the combined efforts of them! OR he actually had massive physical gifts that you are in massive denial of. yep. all the evidence is there, IN SPADES...yet somehow kliturd comes up with opposite of all these truths, time and time again, when it involves the k bros. why do you do this? What is life for you like in real life? If its pouring rain outside do you deny it and go out in a tshirt and shorts? I don't get your life.
So you finally watched the fight and are done telling me Byrd never backed him up? Good. No one said just backing a fighter up would win a fight. But in this case Frazier hits the body more and hits much harder over all than Byrd, with a work rate Vits has never seen. Any fight where Vits has been backed up he's looked uncomfortable. These are facts. You can spew things like hater or whatever else you'd like, it wont change this and the proof is on video just like I told you about Byrd backing him up when you said he didnt. Vits was a very good fighter, but hes also severly overrated all the way from his resume to his skills. That of course is just an opinion.
I said that on the first page. Byrd and Chisora had similar physical dimensions to Frazier and they performed competitively against Vitali, but Frazier, the guy with firepower cant.