George Groves' career on the verge of implosion- Scott Gilfoid

http://www.boxingnews24.com/2015/09/george-groves-career-on-the-verge-of-implosion/#more-199664

Really great writeup

I thought Gilfoid did a really really great job

 

Good article - Karceno

 

Didnt read the article but Scoff gilfoid can suck my *****

 

Stop complimenting yourself you gimp.

 

Grove only hyped because he fought froch, now the hype is dead...

 

Great piece by Gilfoid.

 

:nod

 

You've sunk this low, Scott?
Using a sock puppet to plug your articles?

 

Exactly what I was thinking :rofl

 

Absolutely pathetic. What a ****ing loser.

 

"Groves’ career is at

This content is protected

crush depth in the sea of boxing, and I don’t think he’ll be able to survive one more loss. "

*its

"

This content is protected

I think it’s important for his

This content is protected

to realize what he’s got in Groves so he can match him accordingly with the right type of opposition moving forward in the future."

*sentences don't start with conjunctions.
** promoter, Kalle Sauerland,

"

This content is protected

I think it would be a lot better if Groves was brought down to the European level so that they could stop his

This content is protected

."

*ibid

** Poor style. career's hemorrhaging or career from hemorrhaging.

"The best way to do that is to have him fight someone like unbeaten #8 WBO Jamie Cox (19-0, 11 KOs),

This content is protected

."

*see: Oxford comma debate
** someone like


"If Groves can beat those guys,

This content is protected

I see as European level fighters, then he would show that he belongs at least at that level."

*whom
** Circular logic

"

This content is protected

Groves needs to prove that he can beat that level of

This content is protected

if

This content is protected

he really

This content is protected

trying to fight world champions and thinking he’s got a chance to win."

*Conjunction again.
** fighter (singular), because
*** he can't do that, then
**** Horrendous style. Run-on. Unprofessional tone. Just a disaster of a sentence overall.

"Another good fight for Groves

This content is protected

, who was beaten last Saturday night by WBA “regular” super middleweight champion Fedor

This content is protected

."

*would be against Frank Buglioni
** via a 12 rounds decision or by way of a 12 round decision.


"At this point in Groves’ career,

This content is protected

the likes of Buglioni, Cox, Murray, Callum

This content is protected

"

*I don't know whether he could beat
**Oxford comma.
*** More style faux pas, too much use of personal editorializing with "I think/I don't think" statements, very unprofessional.

 

Scott Gilfoid is a veteran, he is a pioneer of ESB.

A piece of the ESB puzzle that cannot be replaced

 

He could be replaced by an honor roll third grader, and it would be more of an upgrade than a lateral move. ^

 

Erroneous, erroneous on both counts. :deal

You bite your tongue!!!

Scott is one of the most influential boxing writers in ESB columnist history.

 

Better than Dan Ambrose all I'm saying.