Do you agree with dmatos assessment of Louis vs Ali?

Futch also believed Frazier would beat Bowe?


Though that's not as dumb founded as him beating Vitali though is is? tsk tsk

 

Go to the Ali/cus breakdown of Louis ,you tube vid..you will see why Louis jab is inferior and very easy to time for ali.

 

Inferior to Norton's as was stated above?

 

And you would know better than the man who trained both?

 

Well do you think the 230 pound bowe who fought both inside and outside loses to the frazier who squeeked by Buster Mathis and actually lost to him twice before turning pro?:roll:

 

So what you're saying is the you know more about boxing and boxers than possibly the greatest boxing trainer of all time? Lmao, that is rich!!

 

The kid is a clown.

 

I'm with you-- I think Bowe is a terrible matchup for Frazier.

 

Well a small heavyweight in Holyfield gave Bowe fits so it's not out of the question Frazier would.

 

Wouldn't really call 6'3, 217, 78-inch reach "small," especially as an ****ogy to Frazier.

 

I believe one of boxing's greatest geniuses over keyboard warriors.

 

If Holyfield was 6-3, I have a 12 inch Don Cokkell.

 

Fair enough-- I assume that many fighters lie about their height. How much shorter than Foreman was he though, in your estimation?

 

well in all honesty if you want to play the quote game ,like everyone else you wont win here,i gave you an opt.to back off..so here ya go....


"I believe Bowe at 25 is still 3 years from his prime,hes the BEST Hw ive ever had.Holmes was a great boxer and Frazier a great fighter,now I have both his mobility is second only to Ali's" E. Futch

Yea keyboard warrior here! :hi:



Futch he knows better right? :good

 

Hoylfield had a chin and a much better one I didn't see him get battered around and dropped 6 times either by foreman did you?

The problem is you guys WANT Frazier to have these abilities he just didn't have in reality he wasn't half as athletic as Holyfield so why even go there? atsch