Nope ,in your fantasy land Frazier at 5'11 and 205 is a giant at 7 feet tall probably ,he just wasn't the giant you invision him to be in REAL life,guess what he was still 5'11 205. :lol99
Ehm, what does that have to do with anything?? :/ We were talking about Baer and Simon, there was no mention of Frazier. You must be the god of goal post shifting...
Well its your thread isn't it? ,no mention of Frazier huh? Frazier is the reason why the imbecile jab brought up size?Are you DRINKING ? :nut
It was not the topic at hand, you literally completely ignored the posts you replied to and started rambling about Fraziers' size.... Keep it up though, it's entertaining :good
no termy, he just switched the subject and then you claimed that wasn't allowed and refused to follow along by citing the thread title. cheap move, trickster move. red tape move. the type of move that in real life one would get a kick to the ***** to help them make sense of if they should continue pulling it answer their questions termite :deal
Like is said are you drinking? Frazier is not the topic at hand? But led jab throwing in the baer's and simons too??? must be drugs then :nut
The subject was Fraziers size compared to other smaller fighters of yesteryear who defeated bigger ones,which has nothing to do with nothing in the actual match up here..you imbecile.. there was no question.Im not the fool who put simon as small like the other imbecile jab. atsch
Well, this is a fair post. I can see your point of view. I'm inclined to pick the bigger guy because Vitali was also mobile and tough as hell. So Joe would not be trying to chop down some big, slow palooka but a big, skilled, tough, mobile, well-schooled boxer. But I would not dismiss Joe's chances out of hand. Sure, he is a lot smaller. I do wonder though, if his lack of size does not actually become a bit of an issue for Vitali. Vitali fought in an era of big, slow generally quite ponderous men. Boxers who were big and tough but not hard to hit or out-maneuver. Joe was not hard to hit generally I agree, but Frazier is a LOT shorter than Vitali, and he generally came in real low, making him shorter still. There is not a hell of a lot there for Vitali to hit. He would have to try and straighten Joe up with uppercuts, but did Vitali have the kind of uppercut that could do that? Joe was also a lot quicker of hand than many of the guys of Vitlali's era. Essentially, he is nothing like the kind of fighter Vitali ordinarily faced. So I can't write off his chances...
ok fine, let me ask you a question then ok??? what point are you trying to prove and let me tell you why i am asking prior to you answering so as you will have the full clear scoop. Termy, i doubt you recall the point you are arguing. I could be wrong but i would bet that the point you recall is not the same point the others arguing with you recall. Thus i am claiming you are simply really confused as to what you are arguing about. Prove me wrong by answering the question, what is your point of contention on this issue Termy? Spell it out clearly can you?
were you thrown out of a sandbox by a gang of bullies right before you came here termy? you remind me of one of those tiny Mexican dogs that bark at everything
why would I doubt my point when the entire thread is Frazier??Why when its easily read on comment # 165...this moron doesn't even know what hes talking about and its his own thread. :dead