****yzing Mike Tyson's title defenses

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Pugilist_Spec, Sep 27, 2015.


  1. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    22,077
    16,732
    Jun 4, 2009
    that's it Foxy, let it out, we are here for you :rasta
     
  2. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,846
    6,625
    Dec 10, 2014
    Tyson/Spoon would have been a great matchup

    Unfortunately, Witherspoon was sent to the wilderness after he split with King.

    Tyson beat Witherspoon's conqueror James Smith, but an in shape, focused Witherspoons would have been much tougher for Tyson to beat than Smith.

    Tyson didn't duck him. He beat the guy who beat him.
     
  3. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Sorry, Povetkin is probably the second best guy out there based on resume, but thats because he hasnt encountered Fury, Wilder and Joshua yet.

    Povetkin is good, but nothing special, he is primarily a brawler which would fight right into Tysons hands.

    Nearly all the guys who decided to stand toe to toe with Tyson, or stood in Tysons firing range, got sparked sooner or later.
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,582
    Nov 24, 2005
    You're right, but he also got splattered like a bug by Lionel Butler in that time frame too.
    Maybe Butler deserves a similar level of credit as Tyson gets for KOing Tubbs.
     
  5. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Butler was a decent fighter.
     
  6. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,534
    7,355
    May 18, 2006
    :lol:
    He was a decent puncher. There's a difference.
     
  7. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    :d
     
  8. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    4,436
    44
    Aug 2, 2015
    Why would Anyone get similar credit beating Tubbs in 1992 as 1987? :-(
     
  9. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    I'm the wrong age for you to be there duck egg. Remember it is 4 year olds you fantasise over.:rofl:rofl
     
  10. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Tysons the only guy whos opposition never ages.
     
  11. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,534
    7,355
    May 18, 2006
    He's also the only guy considered past prime at 23.
     
  12. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    Not to mention the only one to have booze and drug problems.:rofl:rofl
     
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak banned Full Member

    62,428
    47,610
    Feb 11, 2005
    He's also the only guy who ever won the heavyweight championship at 20. And yet he made more defenses than either Dempsey or Marciano.
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,582
    Nov 24, 2005
    1992 and 1988 actually.

    Because that's the exact time frame where Tubbs was getting good results against Bowe, Seldon, Ferguson and Zolkin, that everyone keeps mentioning.
     
  15. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,582
    Nov 24, 2005
    Well, it's the Tyson boosters here who are bringing up what Tubbs did in 1989-'93. As soon as I mention that he was also stopped by Butler in that timeframe, the whole argument gets reversed ?? :lol:

    We could talk about Tubbs's recent form leading up to the Tyson fight. Wins over Mike Jameson (who knocked him down), Wimpy Halstead and Eddie Gonzales didn't impress anyone.