I probably do you imbecile being im also a former pro arm wrestler....I guess you are still the fool once again!
And some of us believe Billy conn would be a 90's top level fighter as well at HW :nut..... the rest of the garbage you wrote is just that! On the thread topic Fraizer has not k.od anyone with a stronger chin than Ruddock for one,let alone drop anyone. Chuvalo whos eye was injured going into the Frazier fight suffered a fracture of the socket. Its not my fault you cannot see who had the better/stronger hook. I would love those lists of killers frazier fought because im betting they wouldn't last even one round with a Morrison,though that's not the thread subjectas you are TRYING to make it to be. :iamwiths:
Nothing is more amusing than one who proclaims his own ignorance. No one ever said that Conn would be a player in the 90's heavy division but rather that he could carry a fight against a 90's heavy, on his OFF NIGHT as Louis was, to the 12 round. Again, you fail at comprehension, but no one is surprised. I am still waiting for your list of Morrison KO victims that beats Frazier's. Morrison's greatest victory, bar none, was his unilateral track meet against Foreman, a fight which he barely won on my card. That tactic would have worked against none of the more mobile elite heavies of his era, a fact proven by his record. There is a reason that Morrison only shows up twice in his career on the Ring's Annual Ratings of Heavyweights (at NUMBER NINE both times) while Frazier is NUMBER ONE on that same list for SEVEN consecutive years. Both used the left hook as their primary weapon. Can even a simp like you do the math on that one? If you think you are even holding a candle to these arguments you are beyond ignorant and truly deluded.
If you made the rules that you can only throw a left hook, then Frazier would beat any boxer who ever lived.
Frazier would be laid out cold with anyone on that list only using hooks.He wouldn't beat anyone on that list except maybe ****ey "MAYBE and Louis. Using only hooks wouldn't effect ANY of the fighters I listed,except Louis,who is the only guy he MAy defeat using only hooks.
you are a liar,you ran off AGAIN..on the other thread "How would conn do against the 91 fighters" go there I will meet you if you are not scared and i'll even site your EXACT words on it? See when you puff your chest and tell me I have no clue what im talking about...well then who on kevins list would you have him beat,since all your other troll ones ran with you when called on it? you even thought bringing in the RING argument HELPS! :smooch Youve been quite the elusive one with me,im sure by years end with you persuing me then RUNNING away when you have no answer ,you will be able to do a full marathon? As a matter of FACT this is the only thing you came up with in your answer in relation to the thread Topic..... 'It's a consensus that you have no idea about what you are commenting on. You should probably sit out for a few years, watch a lot of tape and, god forbid, go fine a gym and do a little boxing. Maybe then you could see what it is that you now can not see. " Seamus :nut
Hahaha! Fine comedy, my friend. Because you obviously need this spelled out on a rudimentary level, I will review what I have stated and where in your court I put the ball which you have yet to return... This running conversation via the internet is called a "thread". The "topic" of the thread is located in the subject line and reads "Best 10 Left Hooks in HWY History". In reference to this inquiry, I created a list of 10 heavyweights, somewhat chronologically, who had top level hooks. This list included Joe Frazier and Tommy Morrision. I consider Morrsion having barely made the list. You consider him atop it. Here is where it gets real tricky so you may want to read through twice. I asked upon what criteria did you base Morrison's superiority in the hook department. I plainly stated that my criteria was results, given that the left hook was the primary weapon of both fighters. You have offered nothing in this regards. Following my premise, I listed Frazier's best results and asked for ****ogous results from Morrison, which have yet to be offered. Furthermore, given that both guys' offenses were so reliant on the left, I asked why was Morrison a footnote to the 1990's (only twice rated in Ring's Annual Rankings at NUMBER 9) while Frazier, in a Golden Era, was rated NUMBER ONE for seven years? Your only possible explanation (see, i am doing the heavy lifting for you here) would be that Morrison's game outside of the left hook was drastically less sufficient than Frazier's same. It is an argument one could make but I don't buy it. There. Does it all make sense now?
Yet Frazier even said Morrison had the best hook ? But BARLEY makes your list? You DIDNT list ANY results of who Frazier k.od,you couldn't because you know its a hollow list consisiting of about two top guys that he k.od with his left hook.Therfor your falsehood is exposed...again!:deal strike one I didn't offer anything but a video which also has boxing insiders praising Tommys hook,even foreman who took morrisons over Fraziers, strike 2 for you..... the third strike for you is Morrison k.od much bigger guys than Frazier did and overall his highlite left hook reel is on another level..... You're out! :yep
I'm just going to brainstorm and write down the first 10 that I think of- Frazier Morrison Tua Tyson Holyfield Marciano Patterson Foreman Liston Walcott
yes i agree,,, its funny, for a gangly big oaf with little muscle definition C-ooney sure had great power in that left hook.
None of the ingredients of my beer make the list, not even Hops. I ask again if you can cite a source for this Frazier quote. I have never heard it. Not saying he didn't say it. But I would respond, to unanimous agreement, that Frazier won bigger, more important fights and laid out better fighters with his hook. So it's kind of immaterial. I actually did but you are such a frothing idiot you missed it. Travel back in the thread. I am tired of repeating myself. George Foreman tried to tell me that Lou Savarese hit him as hard as any fighter ever did. I ain't buying it. And again you realize that before Frazier ran into Foreman, he had already been ranked in the top-5 for 8 years. George didn't run into a 1969 version of Joe. Who are the best 5 fighters Morrison KO'd? Please let me know this. You are using the Ed Dunkhorst argument which if you knew the sport at all you might find amusing. Morrison exclusively KO'd drooling former champs and contenders who were well on the downside. Frazier dropped the arguably the greatest heavyweight ever and certainly the heavyweight who had the greatest championship chin of all time. The argument is over right there. Over.