Yes box rec the most reliable source of what we know is irrefutable listings and rankings based on who doesn't fight when at there best. This would explain most of your posts..."MOST" not ALL
In a one fight only 87/88 Tyson beats any lewis.I would even take maybe 91 Tyson as well.The only one who fought both,and Tyson near his prime was Bruno,he states Tyson was the better fighter.
Nothing short of the best version of Tyson is beating Lewis. I wouldn't take Bruno's word for it, the man is bitter as hell and clearly has an agenda. He also fought a young and flawed Lewis. Lennox was significantly better under Steward.
Nothing short of the best Lewis as well...the difference is Tyson wouldn't have to be perfect in fighting Lewis in his prime,Lewis would have to be the one who cannot afford a mistake,as Tyson was a much sharper fighter in the 80's early 90's. and could take a massive punch,he took oover 200 punches against Lewis in 2000.Those numbers would significantly dwindle against lighter Tyson.
Dont forget that this guy is actually claiming to be able to predict the outcome of boxing matches. Therefore he would know that Douglas was going to beat Tyson, that Sanders was going to beat Klitschko etc etc.
yeah, that was a bad post that in hindsight more vented my frustration at getting up at stupid o'clock to watch a sport i don't even like than it did add anything to the conversation.
:yep :wtf.....and then.....:iamwiths: Can anyone tell me on a scale from 1 to 10 ...TEN making the most sense where this post above ranks in correlation to making a living on sports betting in boxiing? So again let me get this straight, one wrong loss if it happened" I WAS 16 in 1990" kills the entire career of Sports betting ? atsch...Dumb as they come in JANITOR and the other imbecile" Queenfisher" who I agree with even gave a perfect post on the subject ! TWO idiots ones just smarter than the other.... :yep