CHIN TALK: Best and worse chin's per capita using a mathmatical formula

To find out who has the most glass chin's per capita, let's use a scientific equation.

Using Boxrec's pound for pound rankings for your country take a sample of the top fighters.

For example I will use the UK and the top 10 fighters.

The number of times KO'd in total is 2 (both Khan). So the amount of times top British fighters get KO'd is 0.2 times per fighter.

Now, let's compare them to another country. For this example I will use the USA. While even if we are to compare person for person, they have 4 KO losses already in there top 10, we are judges per capita.

USA have 5 times the population of the UK so we use 5 times as many boxers. So the USA's top 50 fighters have been KO'd a total of 22 times. Giving them an average of 0.44

Thus we have established who has more glass chins between the USA and the UK per capita.

0.44, is larger than 0.2. Thus the USA have more glass jaws per capita. :nod

Can we find any countries with worse chins than the Amercians per capita, or any better than the Brits? :think

 

Why do you use 5 times as many boxers, that's just re****ed.

Plus the community seem to think you're deer UK has the glass chin record

http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=397499

 

Denmark has a population 10 times less than UK so we use 10 times less boxers. So the Denmark top 1 fighter has been KO'd a total of 0 times. Giving them an average of 0.00.

 

Because its PER CAPITA and the USA has 5 times the population.

But if you want to play it that way, let's just use the top 10 v the top 10

Number of times Brits KO 2
Number of times Yanks KO 4.

Yanks have twice the amount of glass Brits have. :hi:

 

Should be the other way around, since USA has 5 times more people, you divide by 5 the total !

So Brits: 2 KO, USA 0.8 KO.

Which mean: 0.2 KO per fighters in UK while 0.08 per fighters in US.


That looks more like it.

 

atsch How does that work you window licker.

Britain has 5 times less the population for 5 times less the chance of producing an iron chinned warrior. But we do, more so per capita than the Untied States of America can :nod

 

I'm pretty terrible at math/stats.

Here's the raw data for the top 20 using Boxrec (I know the OP said top 10 -- but all the info for the top 20 is on one page so it seemed easy enough).

Top 20:

UK - number of KOs: 16
Khan 2 / Clev 1 / Bellew 1 / Haskin 3 / Murray 1 / Mckenzie 3 / Groves 2 / Rose 3


USA - number of KOs: 7

Peterson 1 / Taylor 3 / Jacobs 1 / Thompson 2

 

You cant argue against Mathematical proof

 

Yet there are barely any Brits with Iron chins. Go figure dumbass.

 

More per capita than the USA clearly.

Enjoy your burger and make sure it doesn't dribble down your glass chin(s) tubsy. :burger :hi:

 

As suspected the Americans are chinless.

 

But that's not per capita because USA has 5 times the population.

To make it fair you have to count the next 80 of the Yanks. :nod

 

Since Froch retired there aren't any iron chinned Brits left in the game. That's all we need to conclude that British fighters are glass jawed jokes.

 

5 times less chance of producing a glass chinned fraud like khan *

If you guys had 5 times more the population, we would see 5x more clowns like grove, degale, khan ...