Who do you rate as the UK's top P4P fighter?

Yet you picked Gavin and Porter to annihilate Brook.

And by saying Chaves is a bum- well none of Thurman, Bradley or Rios made him look like one, so if Brook does he must be waaaaayyyy above those guys. :hi:

Let's just be real here. You are upset about Brook because he constantly proves you wrong. :hi:

 

He's not fighting tomato cans like Wilder.

The fact that you think Dan, Gavin and Chaves are 'tomato cans' and don't understand that Al Haymon and Bob Arum are reluctant to feed their top superstars to Brook identifies you as the casual here. :deal

 

Here is the deal, name me the fighter that will happily jump in with Brook at Welterweight right now and his handlers (Arum or Haymon) just allow it, that you would be happy with.

And if Brook didn't fight his mandatory, other than his title, why would they take the risk of fighting someone as good as Brook. And for the record, Bundu, Khan, Bradley, Porter, Sadam Ali & Devon Alexander all turned down the chance to face Brook in final eliminators.

Bradley I believe will be the first one to do it next year but not till after Rios when Arum's exhausted all Bradley's Top Rank options.


You do know boxing is a business right and Kell Brook can't click his fingers and Mayweather, Khan, Pacquiao, Bradley and Thurman are suddenly in the ring with him? :think I'm worrying your butthurt that Brook has proved you wrong has lead you not to recognise this..

 

So you can't actually name a single top fighter that would jump in or be allowed to jump in with Kell Brook can you?

And other than becoming mandatory for the IBF how else was he going to get a title shot. He was top rated by WBO when Pacquiao was champ. Did the WBO ever demand Pac fight him no. Would the WBA and WBC ever demand Mayweather fight him or strip him of the title? Nope.

So to that end, I see the bigger names and their promoters do not want to fight Brook because their is something in boxing called 'risk v reward'. Brook is a very difficult fight when they could have in house fights for less risk. It's simple.

Thurman has said he will fight Brook. What Thurman actually said after his last fight was 'you know who to call, his name is Al Haymon'. Haymon has not even entertained the idea of allowing Khan to fight Brook for 5 times what Thurman v Brook would be, so what do you think his answer would be to that, especially after Brook alreadly exposed an undefeated fighter in his own stable.

And if Thurman is so keen to fight Brook......why has he never had his people contact Brook's people :think

And which fighter over in the States will fight Brook? Plus being that a fight with Bradley would take place on Sky Box Office. Brook v Bradley sells on Box Office at 10pm. It doesn't at 4am. It also sells more tickets over here, hence why that is where it should (and Bob Arum has apparently agreed) and would take place.

And being that Bradley is a big name and will also be shown on HBO, then Brook becomes a marketable opponent for Pacquiao, and maybe Khan will finally take the risk.

Class dismissed. :hi:

 

Thurman said he do it, but you have to go through Al Haymon to request it. Do you think Al Haymon wants Thurman to fight Brook? I don't. Risk/ reward. Learn that. And if Thurman will fight anyone whatever the risk, why didn't he fight Errol Spence?

So being that Thurman, or at least his handlers won't do it, you have failed to name the big name fighter that him or his handlers will fight Brook.

Therefore being that none of Haymons guys (such as Danny garcia, Thurman, Broner, etc) will not take the risk, and Arum won't risk the likes of Crawford or Pacquiao to be cashed out on him at this stage, you can't name one.

The options for next year will be Bradley who will be pretty much out of options with Top Rank and Khan if he is willing to make the step up and doesn't get the Pacquiao fight. A win over them makes a big splash on both sides of the globe then he can sell PPV at 4am over here, guys who avoided the mando shot see a mando against Brook as being a marketable fight, etc.

You seem to understand why people don't fight GGG and why he doesn't fight them, yet you ignore it with Brook and act like it's a Wilder situation. I sense EXTREME levels of butt hurt. Did you lose money on Brook v Porter? Or Brook v Gavin? (who you said beats him).