Sort of ironic, tbh. If anyone is showing hypersensitivity right now, it is you. Because some people rag on white fighters, does not mean that it is due to racism. You asked 'why else'.... Well, there are other reasons why. Mainly it revolves around level of competition in one form or another, but each guy is unique. Wlad gets it because he reigns over a weak hw era, but he is dominant. Calzaghe gets it because he co-reigned over a weak era, and still managed to fight eeaker competition than was necessary, and that "0" tends to rub people the wrong way. As is the case with Mayweather, to them, the "0" represents an unwillingness to seek out a challenge, as opposed to an undefeated fighter. GGG is dominant, and none of the other top guys in the division will fight him. His detractors say it's time to move up and face some real challanges. It is a reasonable idea, although most of the criticisim is unreasonable. Quillin, and guys like that get it too. Guys like Froch, Pacquiao, Kovalev, Cotto(before this GGG), Bradley, etc, don't get lumped in, because they are seens as having taken on challenges. Bottom line is..... No doubt there are plenty of racist people out there, in here on this site, but another, often unaddressed problem is cry-wolf racism. People who do that tend not to realize that they aren't part of the solution, but part of the problem. Another big issue is that people come in and line up on the side that suits their own, pre-conceived agenda. Makes it hard for real people to carry on legit discussions. There is enough discussion on here for people to find what they are looking for.
@CST - have you done a thread on the New Bridge AssassinTM? Berol needs locking in a room strapped to a chair forced to watch endless repeats of Zaggers entire career, endless renditions of Youre Gonna Miss Him When He's Gone, and Zaggers face on a strobe light beamed into his goggle eyes in a dark room
I would love to see Mario Veit KTFO of Mayweather with that telephone pole jab. Mayweather wouldn't get out of the first round.:deal
ah the calturd brandishing a bare scraype win over a 42 year old as some kind of evidence. why this only happens with calzaghe and no one else in history? and did calzaghe stop Hopkins? he could barely scratch him.
Hopkins was 49. Plus Hopkins isn't nearly as good as Calzaghe. It's like comparing ALi to Wilder..and Joe is ALi.